From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, jackmanb@google.com,
renauld@google.com, paul@paul-moore.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
song@kernel.org, revest@chromium.org, keescook@chromium.org,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 3/4] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:41:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202301201845.mf9dWfym-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120000818.1324170-4-kpsingh@kernel.org>
Hi KP,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/KP-Singh/kernel-Add-helper-macros-for-loop-unrolling/20230120-133309
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230120000818.1324170-4-kpsingh%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 3/4] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls
config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20230119 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230120/202301201845.mf9dWfym-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4196ca3278f78c6e19246e54ab0ecb364e37d66a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1dfb90849b42d8af6e854cd6ae8cd96d1ebfc50a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review KP-Singh/kernel-Add-helper-macros-for-loop-unrolling/20230120-133309
git checkout 1dfb90849b42d8af6e854cd6ae8cd96d1ebfc50a
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5:
In file included from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:11:
In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5:
In file included from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:11:
In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5:
In file included from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:11:
In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:31:
In file included from include/linux/bpf_lsm.h:12:
>> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h:36:10: fatal error: 'generated/lsm_count.h' file not found
#include <generated/lsm_count.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +36 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
34
35 /* Include the generated MAX_LSM_COUNT */
> 36 #include <generated/lsm_count.h>
37
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 0:08 [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 0/4] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls KP Singh
2023-01-20 0:08 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 1/4] kernel: Add helper macros for loop unrolling KP Singh
2023-01-20 3:48 ` Kees Cook
2023-01-20 0:08 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 2/4] security: Generate a header with the count of enabled LSMs KP Singh
2023-01-20 4:04 ` Kees Cook
2023-01-20 7:33 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-20 9:50 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-20 9:50 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-20 0:08 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 3/4] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls KP Singh
2023-01-20 4:36 ` Kees Cook
2023-01-20 18:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-02-06 13:04 ` KP Singh
2023-02-06 16:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-02-06 17:48 ` Song Liu
2023-02-06 18:19 ` KP Singh
2023-02-06 18:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-02-06 18:41 ` KP Singh
2023-02-06 18:50 ` Kees Cook
2023-06-08 2:48 ` KP Singh
2023-06-13 21:43 ` Paul Moore
2023-06-13 22:03 ` KP Singh
2023-02-06 19:05 ` Song Liu
2023-02-06 20:11 ` Casey Schaufler
2023-01-20 10:10 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-20 10:41 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-01-20 0:08 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 4/4] bpf: Only enable BPF LSM hooks when an LSM program is attached KP Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202301201845.mf9dWfym-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=renauld@google.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.