From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: kishon@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 2/5] PCI: tegra194: Move dw_pcie_ep_linkup() to threaded IRQ handler
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:37:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230124070722.GA4947@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c9c11e5-c5f2-d36f-6204-ebc76646ee35@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:52:18PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Thanks for pushing this change.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>
Thanks Vidya! I will push a next version with a fix for an issue
identified by kbot. Hopefully that will get merged for 6.3.
Thanks,
Mani
> On 1/11/2023 5:10 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > dw_pcie_ep_linkup() may take more time to execute depending on the EPF
> > driver implementation. Calling this API in the hard IRQ handler is not
> > encouraged since the hard IRQ handlers are supposed to complete quickly.
> >
> > So move the dw_pcie_ep_linkup() call to threaded IRQ handler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > index 02d78a12b6e7..09825b4a075e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ struct tegra_pcie_dw {
> > struct gpio_desc *pex_refclk_sel_gpiod;
> > unsigned int pex_rst_irq;
> > int ep_state;
> > + long link_status;
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct tegra_pcie_dw *to_tegra_pcie(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > @@ -449,9 +450,13 @@ static void pex_ep_event_hot_rst_done(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
> > static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_ep_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
> > {
> > struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie = arg;
> > + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = &pcie->pci.ep;
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > u32 val, speed;
> >
> > + if (test_and_clear_bit(0, &pcie->link_status))
> > + dw_pcie_ep_linkup(ep);
> > +
> > speed = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, pcie->pcie_cap_base + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA) &
> > PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS;
> > clk_set_rate(pcie->core_clk, pcie_gen_freq[speed - 1]);
> > @@ -498,7 +503,6 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_ep_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
> > static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_ep_hard_irq(int irq, void *arg)
> > {
> > struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie = arg;
> > - struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = &pcie->pci.ep;
> > int spurious = 1;
> > u32 status_l0, status_l1, link_status;
> >
> > @@ -514,7 +518,8 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_ep_hard_irq(int irq, void *arg)
> > link_status = appl_readl(pcie, APPL_LINK_STATUS);
> > if (link_status & APPL_LINK_STATUS_RDLH_LINK_UP) {
> > dev_dbg(pcie->dev, "Link is up with Host\n");
> > - dw_pcie_ep_linkup(ep);
> > + set_bit(0, &pcie->link_status);
> > + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 11:40 [RESEND v4 0/5] PCI: endpoint: Rework the EPC to EPF notification Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-11 11:40 ` [RESEND v4 1/5] PCI: dra7xx: Use threaded IRQ handler for "dra7xx-pcie-main" IRQ Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-11 11:40 ` [RESEND v4 2/5] PCI: tegra194: Move dw_pcie_ep_linkup() to threaded IRQ handler Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-18 14:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-23 7:22 ` Vidya Sagar
2023-01-24 7:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-01-11 11:40 ` [RESEND v4 3/5] PCI: endpoint: Use a separate lock for protecting epc->pci_epf list Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-11 11:40 ` [RESEND v4 4/5] PCI: endpoint: Use callback mechanism for passing events from EPC to EPF Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-11 11:40 ` [RESEND v4 5/5] PCI: endpoint: Use link_up() callback in place of LINK_UP notifier Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-11 16:10 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230124070722.GA4947@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.