From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, chris@zankel.net,
david@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] xtensa-mm-support-__have_arch_pte_swp_exclusive.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:36:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203063651.BC546C433EF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: xtensa/mm: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
xtensa-mm-support-__have_arch_pte_swp_exclusive.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: xtensa/mm: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:10:25 +0100
Let's support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE by using bit 1. This bit
should be safe to use for our usecase.
Most importantly, we can still distinguish swap PTEs from PAGE_NONE PTEs
(see pte_present()) and don't use one of the two reserved attribute masks
(1101 and 1111). Attribute mask 1100 and 1110 now identify swap PTEs.
While at it, remove SWP_TYPE_BITS (not really helpful as it's not used in
the actual swap macros) and mask the type in __swp_entry().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230113171026.582290-26-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/pgtable.h~xtensa-mm-support-__have_arch_pte_swp_exclusive
+++ a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
* +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+
* (PAGE_NONE)| PPN | 0 | 00 | ADW | 01 | 11 | 11 |
* +-----------------------------------------+
- * swap | index | type | 01 | 11 | 00 |
+ * swap | index | type | 01 | 11 | e0 |
* +-----------------------------------------+
*
* For T1050 hardware and earlier the layout differs for present and (PAGE_NONE)
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
* RI ring (0=privileged, 1=user, 2 and 3 are unused)
* CA cache attribute: 00 bypass, 01 writeback, 10 writethrough
* (11 is invalid and used to mark pages that are not present)
+ * e exclusive marker in swap PTEs
* w page is writable (hw)
* x page is executable (hw)
* index swap offset / PAGE_SIZE (bit 11-31: 21 bits -> 8 GB)
@@ -158,6 +159,9 @@
#define _PAGE_DIRTY (1<<7) /* software: page dirty */
#define _PAGE_ACCESSED (1<<8) /* software: page accessed (read) */
+/* We borrow bit 1 to store the exclusive marker in swap PTEs. */
+#define _PAGE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE (1<<1)
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
#define _PAGE_CHG_MASK (PAGE_MASK | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_DIRTY)
@@ -343,19 +347,37 @@ ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
}
/*
- * Encode and decode a swap and file entry.
+ * Encode/decode swap entries and swap PTEs. Swap PTEs are all PTEs that
+ * are !pte_none() && !pte_present().
*/
-#define SWP_TYPE_BITS 5
-#define MAX_SWAPFILES_CHECK() BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT > SWP_TYPE_BITS)
+#define MAX_SWAPFILES_CHECK() BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT > 5)
#define __swp_type(entry) (((entry).val >> 6) & 0x1f)
#define __swp_offset(entry) ((entry).val >> 11)
#define __swp_entry(type,offs) \
- ((swp_entry_t){((type) << 6) | ((offs) << 11) | \
+ ((swp_entry_t){(((type) & 0x1f) << 6) | ((offs) << 11) | \
_PAGE_CA_INVALID | _PAGE_USER})
#define __pte_to_swp_entry(pte) ((swp_entry_t) { pte_val(pte) })
#define __swp_entry_to_pte(x) ((pte_t) { (x).val })
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
+static inline int pte_swp_exclusive(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE;
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkexclusive(pte_t pte)
+{
+ pte_val(pte) |= _PAGE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE;
+ return pte;
+}
+
+static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
+{
+ pte_val(pte) &= ~_PAGE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE;
+ return pte;
+}
+
#endif /* !defined (__ASSEMBLY__) */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230203063651.BC546C433EF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.