From: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>, GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
glibc <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
"Bastien Roucariès" <rouca@debian.org>,
"Stefan Puiu" <stefan.puiu@gmail.com>,
"Igor Sysoev" <igor@sysoev.ru>, "Rich Felker" <dalias@libc.org>,
"Andrew Clayton" <a.clayton@nginx.com>,
"Richard Biener" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
"Zack Weinberg" <zack@owlfolio.org>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"Joseph Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
"Jakub Jelinek" <jakub@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sockaddr.3type: BUGS: Document that libc should be fixed using a union
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 16:28:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230205152835.17413-1-alx@kernel.org> (raw)
As discussed before, and Bastien and I seem to agree, ideally we should
define the following types:
struct sockaddr_storage {
union {
struct {
sa_family_t ss_family;
};
struct sockaddr_in sin;
struct sockaddr_in6 sin6;
struct sockaddr_un sun;
// ...
};
};
struct [[deprecated]] sockaddr {
sa_family_t sa_family;
};
union [[gnu::transparent_union]] sockaddr_ptr {
struct sockaddr_storage *ss;
struct sockaddr *sa;
};
And then we could define APIs like:
int bind(int sockfd, const union sockaddr_ptr *addr, socklen_t len);
Link: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/ab492040-2058-bcbe-c920-a9088a20f071@gmail.com/T/#u>
Link: <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20230120134043.10247-1-alx@kernel.org/T/#u>
Cc: GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: glibc <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>
Cc: Stefan Puiu <stefan.puiu@gmail.com>
Cc: Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Andrew Clayton <a.clayton@nginx.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@owlfolio.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
---
man3type/sockaddr.3type | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man3type/sockaddr.3type b/man3type/sockaddr.3type
index 319a5e552..239e836fc 100644
--- a/man3type/sockaddr.3type
+++ b/man3type/sockaddr.3type
@@ -120,6 +120,26 @@ .SH NOTES
.I <netinet/in.h>
and
.IR <sys/un.h> .
+.SH BUGS
+.I sockaddr_storage
+was designed back when strict aliasing wasn't a problem.
+Back then,
+one would define a variable of that type,
+and then access it as any of the other
+.IR sockaddr_ *
+types,
+depending on the value of the first member.
+This is Undefined Behavior.
+However, there is no way to use these APIs without invoking Unedfined Behavior,
+either in the user program or in libc,
+so it is still recommended to use this method.
+The only correct way to use different types in an API is through a union.
+However,
+that union must be implemented in the library,
+since the type must be shared between the library and user code,
+so libc should be fixed by implementing
+.I sockaddr_storage
+as a union.
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR accept (2),
.BR bind (2),
--
2.39.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-05 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-05 15:28 Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2023-02-05 15:31 ` [PATCH] sockaddr.3type: BUGS: Document that libc should be fixed using a union Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06 6:02 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-02-06 11:20 ` Rich Felker
2023-02-06 11:55 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06 13:38 ` Rich Felker
2023-02-06 14:11 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06 17:48 ` Rich Felker
2023-02-05 23:43 ` Rich Felker
2023-02-05 23:59 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06 0:15 ` Rich Felker
2023-02-06 18:45 ` Eric Blake
2023-02-07 1:21 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-18 7:54 ` roucaries bastien
2023-03-20 10:49 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230205152835.17413-1-alx@kernel.org \
--to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=a.clayton@nginx.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=igor@sysoev.ru \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=rouca@debian.org \
--cc=stefan.puiu@gmail.com \
--cc=zack@owlfolio.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.