From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] gve: Introduce a way to disable queue formats
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 22:50:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206225018.50d62d62@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230204192940.2782312-1-jeroendb@google.com>
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:29:40 -0800 Jeroen de Borst wrote:
> The device is capable of simultaneously supporting multiple
> queue formats. These queue formats are:
>
> - GQI-QPL: A queue format with in-order completions and a
> bounce-buffer (Queue Page List)
> - GQI-RDA: A queue format with in-order completions and no
> bounce-buffer (Raw DMA Access)
> - DQO-RDA: A queue format with out-of-order completions and
> no bounce buffer
Thanks but..
> With this change the driver can deliberately pick a queue format.
Driver can already do whatever it wants. Now the _user_ can pick
the format. But the user still has no understanding of what the
practical impact of picking one queue format over another will be.
Do you have a reason to believe that the description above (and in
docs) will be sufficient for user to make a decision?
I tried to search the web but got no hits to any GCP docs either.
Differently put what is you motivation to give this control to the user?
> +
> +struct bpf_prog;
> static int gve_verify_driver_compatibility(struct gve_priv *priv)
Adding the forward declaration for bpf_prog looks like a stray change.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-07 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-04 19:29 [PATCH net-next v4] gve: Introduce a way to disable queue formats Jeroen de Borst
2023-02-07 6:50 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230206225018.50d62d62@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeroendb@google.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.