Re: [PATCH v2] name-rev: fix names by dropping taggerdate workaround

[Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>]

Are there any cases where a taggerdate heuristic would be useful now?
I'm having a hard time coming up with an example of such, so this
change looks very reasonable to me. Even if there existed such a case,
I would imagine it would be better solved using other heuristics rather
than checking the taggerdate since that was a very loose heuristic to
begin with.

> diff --git a/builtin/name-rev.c b/builtin/name-rev.c
> index 15535e914a6..df50abcdeb9 100644
> --- a/builtin/name-rev.c
> +++ b/builtin/name-rev.c
> @@ -113,9 +113,7 @@ static int is_better_name(struct rev_name *name,
>  	 * based on the older tag, even if it is farther away.
>  	 */
>  	if (from_tag && name->from_tag)
> -		return (name->taggerdate > taggerdate ||
> -			(name->taggerdate == taggerdate &&
> -			 name_distance > new_distance));
> +		return name_distance > new_distance;

Comment above this block should be updated to match the new logic.

-Calvin