From: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@gmail.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add ioctl_loop08 test for LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:57:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215055727.20793-1-xiaoshoukui@gmail.com> (raw)
---
.../kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 147 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..047273576
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop08.c
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@ruijie.com.cn>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ *
+ * This is a basic ioctl test about loopdevice LOOP_GET_STATUS
+ * and LOOP_GET_STATUS64.
+ * Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
+ * returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
+ * loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call loop_get_status() if the
+ * passed argument is NULL. The callers expect that the lock is dropped, so
+ * make sure we drop it in that case, too.
+ *
+ * Fixed by commit:
+ *
+ * commit bdac616db9bbadb90b7d6a406144571015e138f7
+ * Author: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
+ * Date: Fri Apr 06 09:57:03 2018 -0700
+ *
+ * loop: fix LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lapi/loop.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+#define MAX_MSGSIZE 4096
+
+static const char lock_imbalance[] = "lock held when returning to user space";
+
+static struct tcase {
+ int ioctl_flag;
+ char *message;
+} tcases[] = {
+ { LOOP_GET_STATUS,
+ "Testing LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance" },
+
+ { LOOP_GET_STATUS64,
+ "Testing LOOP_GET_STATUS64 lock imbalance" },
+};
+
+static int find_kmsg(const char *text_to_find)
+{
+ int f, msg_found = 0;
+ char msg[MAX_MSGSIZE + 1];
+
+ f = SAFE_OPEN("/dev/kmsg", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
+
+ while (1) {
+ TEST(read(f, msg, MAX_MSGSIZE));
+ if (TST_RET < 0) {
+ if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
+ /* there are no more messages */
+ break;
+ else if (TST_ERR == EPIPE)
+ /* current message was overwritten */
+ continue;
+ else
+ tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO,
+ "err reading /dev/kmsg");
+ } else {
+ /* lines from kmsg are not NULL terminated */
+ msg[TST_RET] = '\0';
+ if (strstr(msg, text_to_find) != NULL) {
+ msg_found = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ SAFE_CLOSE(f);
+
+ if (msg_found)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void do_child(void)
+{
+ char dev_path[1024];
+ int dev_num, dev_fd;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcases); i++) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tcases[i].message);
+ dev_num = tst_find_free_loopdev(dev_path, sizeof(dev_path));
+
+ if (dev_num < 0)
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "Failed to find free loop device");
+
+ dev_fd = SAFE_OPEN(dev_path, O_RDWR);
+
+ if (tcases[i].ioctl_flag == LOOP_GET_STATUS)
+ ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS, NULL);
+ else
+ ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS64, NULL);
+
+ if (dev_fd > 0)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
+
+ }
+
+ exit(0);
+
+}
+
+static void verify_ioctl_loop(void)
+{
+ int ret, pid;
+
+ pid = SAFE_FORK();
+ if (!pid)
+ do_child();
+
+ ret = TST_PROCESS_STATE_WAIT(pid, 'D', 5000);
+
+ if (!ret && !find_kmsg(lock_imbalance))
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Trigger ioctl loop lock imbalance");
+ else
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Nothing bad happened, probably");
+
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = verify_ioctl_loop,
+ .needs_root = 1,
+ .needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
+ "CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
+ {"linux-git", "bdac616db9bb "},
+ {}
+ },
+ .needs_drivers = (const char *const[]) {
+ "loop",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .forks_child = 1,
+ .timeout = 60,
+};
--
2.20.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 5:57 xiaoshoukui [this message]
2023-02-28 10:06 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add ioctl_loop08 test for LOOP_GET_STATUS lock imbalance Richard Palethorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230215055727.20793-1-xiaoshoukui@gmail.com \
--to=xiaoshoukui@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.