All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
	Sushma Kalakota <sushma.kalakota@intel.com>,
	Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2] md: Use optimal I/O size for last bitmap page
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:31:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230217183139.106-1-jonathan.derrick@linux.dev> (raw)

From: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>

If the bitmap space has enough room, size the I/O for the last bitmap
page write to the optimal I/O size for the storage device. The expanded
write is checked that it won't overrun the data or metadata.

This change helps increase performance by preventing unnecessary
device-side read-mod-writes due to non-atomic write unit sizes.

Example Intel/Solidigm P5520
Raid10, Chunk-size 64M, bitmap-size 57228 bits

$ mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=10 --raid-devices=4 /dev/nvme{0,1,2,3}n1 --assume-clean --bitmap=internal --bitmap-chunk=64M
$ fio --name=test --direct=1 --filename=/dev/md0 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --runtime=60

Without patch:
  write: IOPS=1676, BW=6708KiB/s (6869kB/s)(393MiB/60001msec); 0 zone resets

With patch:
  write: IOPS=15.7k, BW=61.4MiB/s (64.4MB/s)(3683MiB/60001msec); 0 zone resets

Biosnoop:
Without patch:
Time        Process        PID     Device      LBA        Size      Lat
1.410377    md0_raid10     6900    nvme0n1   W 16         4096      0.02
1.410387    md0_raid10     6900    nvme2n1   W 16         4096      0.02
1.410374    md0_raid10     6900    nvme3n1   W 16         4096      0.01
1.410381    md0_raid10     6900    nvme1n1   W 16         4096      0.02
1.410411    md0_raid10     6900    nvme1n1   W 115346512  4096      0.01
1.410418    md0_raid10     6900    nvme0n1   W 115346512  4096      0.02
1.410915    md0_raid10     6900    nvme2n1   W 24         3584      0.43
1.410935    md0_raid10     6900    nvme3n1   W 24         3584      0.45
1.411124    md0_raid10     6900    nvme1n1   W 24         3584      0.64
1.411147    md0_raid10     6900    nvme0n1   W 24         3584      0.66
1.411176    md0_raid10     6900    nvme3n1   W 2019022184 4096      0.01
1.411189    md0_raid10     6900    nvme2n1   W 2019022184 4096      0.02

With patch:
Time        Process        PID     Device      LBA        Size      Lat
5.747193    md0_raid10     727     nvme0n1   W 16         4096      0.01
5.747192    md0_raid10     727     nvme1n1   W 16         4096      0.02
5.747195    md0_raid10     727     nvme3n1   W 16         4096      0.01
5.747202    md0_raid10     727     nvme2n1   W 16         4096      0.02
5.747229    md0_raid10     727     nvme3n1   W 1196223704 4096      0.02
5.747224    md0_raid10     727     nvme0n1   W 1196223704 4096      0.01
5.747279    md0_raid10     727     nvme0n1   W 24         4096      0.01
5.747279    md0_raid10     727     nvme1n1   W 24         4096      0.02
5.747284    md0_raid10     727     nvme3n1   W 24         4096      0.02
5.747291    md0_raid10     727     nvme2n1   W 24         4096      0.02
5.747314    md0_raid10     727     nvme2n1   W 2234636712 4096      0.01
5.747317    md0_raid10     727     nvme1n1   W 2234636712 4096      0.02

Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>
---
v1->v2: Add more information to commit message

 drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
index e7cc6ba1b657..569297ea9b99 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
 	rdev = NULL;
 	while ((rdev = next_active_rdev(rdev, mddev)) != NULL) {
 		int size = PAGE_SIZE;
+		int optimal_size = PAGE_SIZE;
 		loff_t offset = mddev->bitmap_info.offset;
 
 		bdev = (rdev->meta_bdev) ? rdev->meta_bdev : rdev->bdev;
@@ -228,9 +229,14 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
 			int last_page_size = store->bytes & (PAGE_SIZE-1);
 			if (last_page_size == 0)
 				last_page_size = PAGE_SIZE;
-			size = roundup(last_page_size,
-				       bdev_logical_block_size(bdev));
+			size = roundup(last_page_size, bdev_logical_block_size(bdev));
+			if (bdev_io_opt(bdev) > bdev_logical_block_size(bdev))
+				optimal_size = roundup(last_page_size, bdev_io_opt(bdev));
+			else
+				optimal_size = size;
 		}
+
+
 		/* Just make sure we aren't corrupting data or
 		 * metadata
 		 */
@@ -246,9 +252,11 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
 				goto bad_alignment;
 		} else if (offset < 0) {
 			/* DATA  BITMAP METADATA  */
-			if (offset
-			    + (long)(page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512))
-			    + size/512 > 0)
+			loff_t off = offset + (long)(page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512));
+			if (size != optimal_size &&
+			    off + optimal_size/512 <= 0)
+				size = optimal_size;
+			else if (off + size/512 > 0)
 				/* bitmap runs in to metadata */
 				goto bad_alignment;
 			if (rdev->data_offset + mddev->dev_sectors
@@ -257,10 +265,11 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
 				goto bad_alignment;
 		} else if (rdev->sb_start < rdev->data_offset) {
 			/* METADATA BITMAP DATA */
-			if (rdev->sb_start
-			    + offset
-			    + page->index*(PAGE_SIZE/512) + size/512
-			    > rdev->data_offset)
+			loff_t off = rdev->sb_start + offset + page->index*(PAGE_SIZE/512);
+			if (size != optimal_size &&
+			    off + optimal_size/512 <= rdev->data_offset)
+				size = optimal_size;
+			else if (off + size/512 > rdev->data_offset)
 				/* bitmap runs in to data */
 				goto bad_alignment;
 		} else {
-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-17 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-17 18:31 Jonathan Derrick [this message]
2023-02-21  2:38 ` [PATCH v2] md: Use optimal I/O size for last bitmap page Xiao Ni
2023-02-21  3:31   ` Jonathan Derrick
2023-02-21  5:35     ` Xiao Ni
2023-02-21  7:34       ` Jonathan Derrick
2023-02-21 14:39         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-02-21 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230217183139.106-1-jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
    --to=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=sushma.kalakota@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.