From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Tests for uninitialized stack reads
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 22:04:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230219200427.606541-3-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230219200427.606541-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Three testcases to make sure that stack reads from uninitialized
locations are accepted by verifier when executed in privileged mode:
- read from a fixed offset;
- read from a variable offset;
- passing a pointer to stack to a helper converts
STACK_INVALID to STACK_MISC.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uninit_stack.c | 9 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/uninit_stack.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uninit_stack.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uninit_stack.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uninit_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uninit_stack.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e64c71948491
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uninit_stack.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "uninit_stack.skel.h"
+
+void test_uninit_stack(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(uninit_stack);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uninit_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uninit_stack.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8a403470e557
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uninit_stack.c
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+/* Read an uninitialized value from stack at a fixed offset */
+SEC("socket")
+__naked int read_uninit_stack_fixed_off(void *ctx)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ /* force stack depth to be 128 */ \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 128) = r1; \
+ r1 = *(u8 *)(r10 - 8 ); \
+ r0 += r1; \
+ r1 = *(u8 *)(r10 - 11); \
+ r1 = *(u8 *)(r10 - 13); \
+ r1 = *(u8 *)(r10 - 15); \
+ r1 = *(u16*)(r10 - 16); \
+ r1 = *(u32*)(r10 - 32); \
+ r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 64); \
+ /* read from a spill of a wrong size, it is a separate \
+ * branch in check_stack_read_fixed_off() \
+ */ \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 72) = r1; \
+ r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 72); \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+"
+ ::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* Read an uninitialized value from stack at a variable offset */
+SEC("socket")
+__naked int read_uninit_stack_var_off(void *ctx)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
+ /* force stack depth to be 64 */ \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 64) = r0; \
+ r0 = -r0; \
+ /* give r0 a range [-31, -1] */ \
+ if r0 s<= -32 goto exit_%=; \
+ if r0 s>= 0 goto exit_%=; \
+ /* access stack using r0 */ \
+ r1 = r10; \
+ r1 += r0; \
+ r2 = *(u8*)(r1 + 0); \
+exit_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+static __noinline void dummy(void) {}
+
+/* Pass a pointer to uninitialized stack memory to a helper.
+ * Passed memory block should be marked as STACK_MISC after helper call.
+ */
+SEC("socket")
+__log_level(7) __msg("fp-104=mmmmmmmm")
+__naked int helper_uninit_to_misc(void *ctx)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ /* force stack depth to be 128 */ \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 128) = r1; \
+ r1 = r10; \
+ r1 += -128; \
+ r2 = 32; \
+ call %[bpf_trace_printk]; \
+ /* Call to dummy() forces print_verifier_state(..., true), \
+ * thus showing the stack state, matched by __msg(). \
+ */ \
+ call %[dummy]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_trace_printk),
+ __imm(dummy)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-19 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-19 20:04 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Allow reads from uninit stack Eduard Zingerman
2023-02-19 20:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Eduard Zingerman
2023-02-19 20:04 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-02-22 20:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230219200427.606541-3-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.