From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Remove duplicated calls of reverse_cpuid_check()
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:21:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230221032156.791-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Remove duplicated calls of reverse_cpuid_check() in __kvm_cpu_cap_mask()
and kvm_cpu_cap_{clear, set, get}().
reverse_cpuid_check() is directly called by:
- feature_bit() / __feature_bit()
- x86_feature_cpuid()
- kvm_cpu_cap_{clear, set, get}()
- __kvm_cpu_cap_mask()
Also __kvm_cpu_cap_mask() calls x86_feature_cpuid(),
and kvm_cpu_cap_{clear, set, get}() calls __feature_bit().
It makes the direct call of reverse_cpuid_check() duplicated.
For functions call reverse_cpuid_check() twice indirectly (e.g. cpuid_entry_get()
calls both __feature_bit() and x86_feature_cpuid()), keep them as they are.
Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 --
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 8f8edeaf8177..f4089d7a7c4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -545,8 +545,6 @@ static __always_inline void __kvm_cpu_cap_mask(unsigned int leaf)
const struct cpuid_reg cpuid = x86_feature_cpuid(leaf * 32);
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 entry;
- reverse_cpuid_check(leaf);
-
cpuid_count(cpuid.function, cpuid.index,
&entry.eax, &entry.ebx, &entry.ecx, &entry.edx);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
index b1658c0de847..d781372a01e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
@@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_cpu_cap_clear(unsigned int x86_feature)
{
unsigned int x86_leaf = __feature_leaf(x86_feature);
- reverse_cpuid_check(x86_leaf);
kvm_cpu_caps[x86_leaf] &= ~__feature_bit(x86_feature);
}
@@ -200,7 +199,6 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_cpu_cap_set(unsigned int x86_feature)
{
unsigned int x86_leaf = __feature_leaf(x86_feature);
- reverse_cpuid_check(x86_leaf);
kvm_cpu_caps[x86_leaf] |= __feature_bit(x86_feature);
}
@@ -208,7 +206,6 @@ static __always_inline u32 kvm_cpu_cap_get(unsigned int x86_feature)
{
unsigned int x86_leaf = __feature_leaf(x86_feature);
- reverse_cpuid_check(x86_leaf);
return kvm_cpu_caps[x86_leaf] & __feature_bit(x86_feature);
}
base-commit: e73ba25fdc241c06ab48a1f708a30305d6036e66
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 3:21 Binbin Wu [this message]
2023-02-21 15:54 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Remove duplicated calls of reverse_cpuid_check() Sean Christopherson
2023-02-22 2:38 ` Binbin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230221032156.791-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.