From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>,
Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] selftests/proc: Assert clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME) VS /proc/uptime monotonicity
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:46:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230222144649.624380-9-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230222144649.624380-1-frederic@kernel.org>
The first field of /proc/uptime relies on the CLOCK_BOOTTIME clock which
can also be fetched from clock_gettime() API.
Improve the test coverage while verifying the monotonicity of
CLOCK_BOOTTIME accross both interfaces.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c | 21 ++++++++++++++----
.../testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c | 22 +++++++++++++++----
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h | 12 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c
index 35bddd9dd60b..f335eec5067e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
-// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime increments monotonically.
-// We don't test idle time monotonicity due to broken iowait task
-// counting, cf: comment above get_cpu_idle_time_us()
+// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime and CLOCK_BOOTTIME increment
+// monotonically. We don't test idle time monotonicity due to broken iowait
+// task counting, cf: comment above get_cpu_idle_time_us()
#undef NDEBUG
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
int main(void)
{
- uint64_t start, u0, u1;
+ uint64_t start, u0, u1, c0, c1;
int fd;
fd = open("/proc/uptime", O_RDONLY);
@@ -35,10 +35,23 @@ int main(void)
u0 = proc_uptime(fd);
start = u0;
+ c0 = clock_boottime();
+
do {
u1 = proc_uptime(fd);
+ c1 = clock_boottime();
+
+ /* Is /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
assert(u1 >= u0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME monotonic ? */
+ assert(c1 >= c0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME VS /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
+ assert(c0 >= u0);
+
u0 = u1;
+ c0 = c1;
} while (u1 - start < 100);
return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c
index 7ad79d5eaa84..ae453daa96c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c
@@ -13,9 +13,10 @@
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
-// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime increments monotonically
-// while shifting across CPUs. We don't test idle time monotonicity
-// due to broken iowait task counting, cf: comment above get_cpu_idle_time_us()
+// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime and CLOCK_BOOTTIME increment
+// monotonically while shifting across CPUs. We don't test idle time
+// monotonicity due to broken iowait task counting, cf: comment above
+// get_cpu_idle_time_us()
#undef NDEBUG
#include <assert.h>
#include <errno.h>
@@ -43,10 +44,10 @@ static inline int sys_sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, unsigned int len, unsigned lo
int main(void)
{
+ uint64_t u0, u1, c0, c1;
unsigned int len;
unsigned long *m;
unsigned int cpu;
- uint64_t u0, u1;
int fd;
/* find out "nr_cpu_ids" */
@@ -62,6 +63,8 @@ int main(void)
assert(fd >= 0);
u0 = proc_uptime(fd);
+ c0 = clock_boottime();
+
for (cpu = 0; cpu < len * 8; cpu++) {
memset(m, 0, len);
m[cpu / (8 * sizeof(unsigned long))] |= 1UL << (cpu % (8 * sizeof(unsigned long)));
@@ -70,8 +73,19 @@ int main(void)
sys_sched_setaffinity(0, len, m);
u1 = proc_uptime(fd);
+ c1 = clock_boottime();
+
+ /* Is /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
assert(u1 >= u0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME monotonic ? */
+ assert(c1 >= c0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME VS /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
+ assert(c0 >= u0);
+
u0 = u1;
+ c0 = c1;
}
return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h
index ca55abeb0ccc..730cce4a3d73 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h
@@ -19,9 +19,21 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <time.h>
#include "proc.h"
+static uint64_t clock_boottime(void)
+{
+ struct timespec ts;
+ int err;
+
+ err = clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, &ts);
+ assert(err >= 0);
+
+ return (ts.tv_sec * 100) + (ts.tv_nsec / 10000000);
+}
+
static uint64_t proc_uptime(int fd)
{
uint64_t val1, val2;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 14:46 [PATCH 0/8] timers/nohz: Fixes and cleanups v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/8] timers/nohz: Restructure and reshuffle struct tick_sched Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] timers/nohz: Only ever update sleeptime from idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] timers/nohz: Protect idle/iowait sleep time under seqcount Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] timers/nohz: Add a comment about broken iowait counter update race Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-25 9:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] " Xin Zhao
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] timers/nohz: Remove middle-function __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] MAINTAINERS: Remove stale email address Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 7/8] selftests/proc: Remove idle time monotonicity assertions Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-03-08 15:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] selftests/proc: Assert clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME) VS /proc/uptime monotonicity Mirsad Todorovac
2023-03-21 12:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-03-26 20:03 ` Mirsad Goran Todorovac
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230222144649.624380-9-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=liaoyu15@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.