From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts and qemu-system-i386
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:10:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230227111050.54083-2-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230227111050.54083-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Hardly anybody still uses 32-bit x86 hosts today, so we should
start deprecating them to finally have less test efforts.
With regards to 32-bit KVM support in the x86 Linux kernel,
the developers confirmed that they do not need a recent
qemu-system-i386 binary here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/Y%2ffkTs5ajFy0hP1U@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 15084f7bea..98517f5187 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -196,6 +196,19 @@ CI coverage support may bitrot away before the deprecation process
completes. The little endian variants of MIPS (both 32 and 64 bit) are
still a supported host architecture.
+32-bit x86 hosts and ``qemu-system-i386`` (since 8.0)
+'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+Testing 32-bit x86 host OS support takes a lot of precious time during the
+QEMU contiguous integration tests, and considering that most OS vendors
+stopped shipping 32-bit variants of their x86 OS distributions and most
+x86 hardware from the past >10 years is capable of 64-bit, keeping the
+32-bit support alive is an inadequate burden for the QEMU project. Thus
+QEMU will soon drop the support for 32-bit x86 host systems and the
+``qemu-system-i386`` binary. Use ``qemu-system-x86_64`` (which is a proper
+superset of ``qemu-system-i386``) on a 64-bit host machine instead.
+
+
QEMU API (QAPI) events
----------------------
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-27 11:10 [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 11:10 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-02-27 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts and qemu-system-i386 Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-27 20:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-27 20:21 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-28 8:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 12:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-28 9:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 16:57 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-27 22:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-28 7:43 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 7:49 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 8:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 8:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 9:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 9:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 9:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 10:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 10:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-28 10:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 11:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 11:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 11:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-28 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-27 20:25 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-28 7:52 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts and qemu-system-arm Thomas Huth
2023-02-27 18:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 7:39 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 9:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-28 11:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-28 20:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-28 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-01 6:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-01 7:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-03-01 7:46 ` Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230227111050.54083-2-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.