From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, william.lam@bytedance.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, osalvador@suse.de, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-compaction-fix-the-possible-deadlock-when-isolating-hugetlb-pages.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 12:31:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313193139.E7BE1C433D2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm: compaction: fix the possible deadlock when isolating hugetlb pages
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-compaction-fix-the-possible-deadlock-when-isolating-hugetlb-pages.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-compaction-fix-the-possible-deadlock-when-isolating-hugetlb-pages.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: mm: compaction: fix the possible deadlock when isolating hugetlb pages
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:37:17 +0800
When trying to isolate a migratable pageblock, it can contain several
normal pages or several hugetlb pages (e.g. CONT-PTE 64K hugetlb on
arm64) in a pageblock. That means we may hold the lru lock of a normal
page to continue to isolate the next hugetlb page by
isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page() in the same migratable pageblock.
However in isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(), it may allocate a new hugetlb
page and dissolve the old one via alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio() if
the hugetlb's refcount is zero. That means we can still enter the direct
compaction path to allocate a new hugetlb page under the current lru lock,
which may cause a deadlock.
To avoid this possible deadlock, we should release the lru lock when
trying to isolate a hugetbl page. Moreover it does not make sense to take
the lru lock to isolate a hugetlb, which is not in the lru list.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a24a86fbae09711e61dc4424aa7aebff718e9995.1678703534.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: 369fa227c219 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages")
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: William Lam <william.lam@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-fix-the-possible-deadlock-when-isolating-hugetlb-pages
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -893,6 +893,11 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compac
}
if (PageHuge(page) && cc->alloc_contig) {
+ if (locked) {
+ unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
+ locked = NULL;
+ }
+
ret = isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(page, &cc->migratepages);
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com are
mm-compaction-consider-the-number-of-scanning-compound-pages-in-isolate-fail-path.patch
mm-compaction-fix-the-possible-deadlock-when-isolating-hugetlb-pages.patch
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 19:31 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-16 22:56 + mm-compaction-fix-the-possible-deadlock-when-isolating-hugetlb-pages.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230313193139.E7BE1C433D2@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=william.lam@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.