diff for duplicates of <20230314110250.00005685@Huawei.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1944a81..e9681f7 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ From a quick glance that looks good to me. We'll also need to kick off the spec change with a code-first proposal. I think current standard way to do that is a bugzilla entry in EDK2 repo -https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/buglist.cgi?component=Specification%20Update&product=EDK2%20Code%20First&resolution=--- +https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/buglist.cgi?component=Specification%20Update&productíK2%20Code%20First&resolution=--- and the get someone in ASWG to create equivalent tracking issue in mantis. Great if you already have that in hand via relevant ARM folks. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0461794..07fa185 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,16 +5,16 @@ "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug\0" "Date\0Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:02:50 +0000\0" "To\0James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>\0" - "Cc\0<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>" - <loongarch@lists.linux.dev> - <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev> - <kvm@vger.kernel.org> - <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> - <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> - <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org> - <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - <x86@kernel.org> + "Cc\0linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" + loongarch@lists.linux.dev + kvmarm@lists.linux.dev + kvm@vger.kernel.org + linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org + linux-arch@vger.kernel.org + linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + x86@kernel.org Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name> Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com> Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - " <kangkang.shen@futurewei.com>\0" + " kangkang.shen@futurewei.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:50:52 +0000\n" @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ "\n" "We'll also need to kick off the spec change with a code-first proposal.\n" "I think current standard way to do that is a bugzilla entry in EDK2 repo \n" - "https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/buglist.cgi?component=Specification%20Update&product=EDK2%20Code%20First&resolution=---\n" + "https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/buglist.cgi?component=Specification%20Update&product\303\255K2%20Code%20First&resolution=---\n" "and the get someone in ASWG to create equivalent tracking issue in mantis.\n" "\n" "Great if you already have that in hand via relevant ARM folks.\n" @@ -122,4 +122,4 @@ "> > Rafael / other ACPI specialists: Any suggestions on how best to do this? \n" > -5394153be686b9f42928114d76e8598b1a68a3e5c3e442f4423d1c202ca4cb6f +22aee7f922d58a989229ad7a61fc71ca86d26902ee5a2d32d6ebecd57957e854
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 1944a81..3192b03 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -81,4 +81,10 @@ Jonathan > > > > Assuming everyone agrees this bit of introspection is useful, > > Rafael / other ACPI specialists: Any suggestions on how best to do this? -> +> + + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 0461794..07e10c4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -120,6 +120,12 @@ "> > \n" "> > Assuming everyone agrees this bit of introspection is useful,\n" "> > Rafael / other ACPI specialists: Any suggestions on how best to do this? \n" - > + "> \n" + "\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -5394153be686b9f42928114d76e8598b1a68a3e5c3e442f4423d1c202ca4cb6f +c22ef82296909f685034bee5e888a62edccfce0094f751ed20a2e04d5276f7cf
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.