All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/12] ARM: vfp: Pass successful return address via register R3
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:18:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320131845.3138015-3-ardb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320131845.3138015-1-ardb@kernel.org>

In preparation for reimplementing the do_vfp()->vfp_support_entry()
handover in C code, switch to using R3 to pass the 'success' return
address, rather than R9, as it cannot be used for parameter passing.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
 arch/arm/vfp/entry.S |  1 +
 arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S | 14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S b/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S
index cfedc2a3dbd68f1c..6dabb47617781a5f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/entry.S
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 @
 ENTRY(do_vfp)
 	mov	r1, r10
+	mov	r3, r9
  	ldr	r4, .LCvfp
 	ldr	pc, [r4]		@ call VFP entry point
 ENDPROC(do_vfp)
diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
index 6d056d810e4868c2..60acd42e05786e95 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  *
  * This code is called from the kernel's undefined instruction trap.
  * r1 holds the thread_info pointer
- * r9 holds the return address for successful handling.
+ * r3 holds the return address for successful handling.
  * lr holds the return address for unrecognised instructions.
  * sp points to a struct pt_regs (as defined in include/asm/proc/ptrace.h)
  */
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
 @  r0  = instruction opcode (32-bit ARM or two 16-bit Thumb)
 @  r1  = thread_info pointer
 @  r2  = PC value to resume execution after successful emulation
-@  r9  = normal "successful" return address
+@  r3  = normal "successful" return address
 @  lr  = unrecognised instruction return address
 @  IRQs enabled.
 ENTRY(vfp_support_entry)
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ ENTRY(vfp_support_entry)
 	bne	look_for_VFP_exceptions	@ VFP is already enabled
 
 	DBGSTR1 "enable %x", r10
-	ldr	r3, vfp_current_hw_state_address
+	ldr	r9, vfp_current_hw_state_address
 	orr	r1, r1, #FPEXC_EN	@ user FPEXC has the enable bit set
-	ldr	r4, [r3, r11, lsl #2]	@ vfp_current_hw_state pointer
+	ldr	r4, [r9, r11, lsl #2]	@ vfp_current_hw_state pointer
 	bic	r5, r1, #FPEXC_EX	@ make sure exceptions are disabled
 	cmp	r4, r10			@ this thread owns the hw context?
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ vfp_reload_hw:
 #endif
 
 	DBGSTR1	"load state %p", r10
-	str	r10, [r3, r11, lsl #2]	@ update the vfp_current_hw_state pointer
+	str	r10, [r9, r11, lsl #2]	@ update the vfp_current_hw_state pointer
 					@ Load the saved state back into the VFP
 	VFPFLDMIA r10, r5		@ reload the working registers while
 					@ FPEXC is in a safe state
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ vfp_hw_state_valid:
 					@ always subtract 4 from the following
 					@ instruction address.
 	local_bh_enable_ti r10, r4
-	ret	r9			@ we think we have handled things
+	ret	r3			@ we think we have handled things
 
 
 look_for_VFP_exceptions:
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ skip:
 process_exception:
 	DBGSTR	"bounce"
 	mov	r2, sp			@ nothing stacked - regdump is at TOS
-	mov	lr, r9			@ setup for a return to the user code.
+	mov	lr, r3			@ setup for a return to the user code.
 
 	@ Now call the C code to package up the bounce to the support code
 	@   r0 holds the trigger instruction
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 13:18 [PATCH v4 00/12] ARM: vfp: Switch to C API to en/disable softirqs Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] ARM: vfp: Pass thread_info pointer to vfp_support_entry Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-20 13:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] ARM: vfp: Fix broken softirq handling with instrumentation enabled Ard Biesheuvel
2023-04-09 14:29   ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-04-09 14:29     ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-04-10 20:15     ` Guenter Roeck
2023-04-10 20:15       ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] ARM: entry: Fix iWMMXT TIF flag handling Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-20 13:18   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 14:32   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-21 14:32     ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-21 19:19     ` Nicolas Pitre
2023-03-21 19:19       ` Nicolas Pitre
2023-03-21 19:32       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 19:32         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] ARM: vfp: Record VFP bounces as perf emulation faults Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 14:33   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] ARM: vfp: Remove workaround for Feroceon CPUs Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 14:44   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-21 15:42     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 20:40       ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-22  7:26       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-03-21 20:00     ` Nicolas Pitre
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] ARM: vfp: Reimplement VFP exception entry in C code Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] ARM: kernel: Get rid of thread_info::used_cp[] array Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 14:58   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] ARM: vfp: Use undef hook for handling VFP exceptions Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 14:59   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-21 15:41     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] ARM: entry: Disregard Thumb undef exception in coproc dispatch Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 15:05   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] ARM: iwmmxt: Use undef hook to enable coprocessor for task Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 15:06   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] ARM: entry: Make asm coproc dispatch code NWFPE only Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-21 15:11   ` Linus Walleij
2023-03-23  2:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] ARM: vfp: Switch to C API to en/disable softirqs Guenter Roeck
2023-03-23  8:33   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230320131845.3138015-3-ardb@kernel.org \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.