All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu: Move lock from iommu_change_dev_def_domain() to its caller
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:49:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322064956.263419-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322064956.263419-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

The intention is to make it possible to put group ownership check and
default domain change in a same critical region protected by the group's
mutex lock. No intentional functional change.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 6d27fd585e75..54a5bd79d21b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -2889,7 +2889,7 @@ static int iommu_change_dev_def_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
 	int ret, dev_def_dom;
 	struct device *dev;
 
-	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
 
 	if (group->default_domain != group->domain) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(prev_dev, "Group not assigned to default domain\n");
@@ -2978,28 +2978,15 @@ static int iommu_change_dev_def_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
 		goto free_new_domain;
 
 	group->domain = group->default_domain;
-
-	/*
-	 * Release the mutex here because ops->probe_finalize() call-back of
-	 * some vendor IOMMU drivers calls arm_iommu_attach_device() which
-	 * in-turn might call back into IOMMU core code, where it tries to take
-	 * group->mutex, resulting in a deadlock.
-	 */
-	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
-
-	/* Make sure dma_ops is appropriatley set */
-	iommu_group_do_probe_finalize(dev, group->default_domain);
 	iommu_domain_free(prev_dom);
+
 	return 0;
 
 free_new_domain:
 	iommu_domain_free(group->default_domain);
 	group->default_domain = prev_dom;
 	group->domain = prev_dom;
-
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -3089,7 +3076,19 @@ static ssize_t iommu_group_store_type(struct iommu_group *group,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
 	ret = iommu_change_dev_def_domain(group, dev, req_type);
+	/*
+	 * Release the mutex here because ops->probe_finalize() call-back of
+	 * some vendor IOMMU drivers calls arm_iommu_attach_device() which
+	 * in-turn might call back into IOMMU core code, where it tries to take
+	 * group->mutex, resulting in a deadlock.
+	 */
+	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
+
+	/* Make sure dma_ops is appropriatley set */
+	if (!ret)
+		iommu_group_do_probe_finalize(dev, group->default_domain);
 	ret = ret ?: count;
 
 out:
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-22  6:49 [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu: Extend changing default domain to normal group Lu Baolu
2023-03-22  6:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Call arm_iommu_release_mapping() in release path Lu Baolu
2023-03-22  6:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu: Split iommu_group_remove_device() into helpers Lu Baolu
2023-03-22  6:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu: Same critical region for device release and removal Lu Baolu
2023-03-22  6:49 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2023-03-22  6:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] iommu: Replace device_lock() with group->mutex Lu Baolu
2023-03-22  6:49 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] iommu: Cleanup iommu_change_dev_def_domain() Lu Baolu
2023-03-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu: Extend changing default domain to normal group Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230322064956.263419-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.