From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme: add polling options for loop target
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:52:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322135200.GA16587@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322084651.xmnup2ag3ve6jr3a@carbon.lan>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:46:51AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The blktest I have written for this problem fails for loop without something
> like this. We can certaintanly teach blktests not run a specific test for loop
> but currently, the _require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics check is including loop.
Who says that we could support polling on all current and future
fabrics transports?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 0:23 [PATCH 0/3] nvme fabrics polling fixes Keith Busch
2023-03-22 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-fabrics: add queue setup helpers Keith Busch
2023-03-22 1:46 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-22 4:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-22 5:21 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-22 7:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 9:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 9:25 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-22 0:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: add polling options for loop target Keith Busch
2023-03-22 1:47 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-22 7:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 8:46 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-03-22 14:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 14:30 ` Keith Busch
2023-03-22 0:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: directly poll requests Keith Busch
2023-03-22 7:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 9:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 18:16 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-31 7:57 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-03-22 7:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] nvme fabrics polling fixes Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:48 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 13:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230322135200.GA16587@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.