From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E50827706 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 22:24:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1679696677; x=1711232677; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=+7ZyUTybdWs45/6fgNV98snbN7kSCu4sivZDpG7vG80=; b=fLPAUfflwodS7FDY8+W3RywgNmAvhcDy4rgzyWHHW9EBx72KtfP6ddM7 x5MsNPd0ZXSxFGbrOuJT6Zlmd23PXs5sMvmp6wjBlFBqGegPLYZMKi821 Ody0N+N+XHYjDvUTYQfp/VWCznIEqIUUtOqp5NC3QoToWg89JmfhFS/BX GOtHJs+yX/y1/rVQi3gReyJMx97w5T7LT8/Kjwh+fI9nculDvcKKn4yZX JjuxjLDIe86tK4Mmk8CeJRlm72ya0fvnYPVz1GPlaOHTv+9SjaX5k/t5N IrdDvWO0KRqm+7NQh02HJrt90TYpeoD5K/XWrFCCLsGvwp4nclq6As2Dt Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10659"; a="341467787" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,289,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="341467787" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2023 15:24:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10659"; a="676326411" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,289,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="676326411" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b613635ddfff) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2023 15:24:36 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b613635ddfff with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pfppr-000Fi2-1C; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 22:24:35 +0000 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 06:24:29 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall Subject: [tytso-ext4:dev 16/43] fs/ext4/balloc.c:114:34-36: WARNING opportunity for max() Message-ID: <202303250641.suO2VyVG-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline BCC: lkp@intel.com CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org TO: Kemeng Shi CC: "Theodore Ts'o" tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev head: 463f2e46bf7cfa718f020a933a6941bd6db1b267 commit: 68e294dcccf965c93d65c4660547794728a4cff0 [16/43] ext4: improve inode table blocks counting in ext4_num_overhead_clusters :::::: branch date: 19 hours ago :::::: commit date: 19 hours ago config: sh-randconfig-c043-20230324 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230325/202303250641.suO2VyVG-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Reported-by: Julia Lawall | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303250641.suO2VyVG-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> fs/ext4/balloc.c:114:34-36: WARNING opportunity for max() >> fs/ext4/balloc.c:116:30-32: WARNING opportunity for min() -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests