From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Liang Kan <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<acme@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] cxl: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:50:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230327165038.00002037@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202303250523.JdddC4Ld-lkp@intel.com>
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 05:12:01 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
> [also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core cxl/next cxl/pending linus/master v6.3-rc3 next-20230324]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jonathan-Cameron/cxl-Add-function-to-count-regblocks-of-a-given-type/20230325-011827
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324171313.18448-5-Jonathan.Cameron%40huawei.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] cxl: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver
> config: parisc-randconfig-r036-20230324 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230325/202303250523.JdddC4Ld-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/a04f0052a1fa10bda54569c8c7b3ab7fe60ca975
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jonathan-Cameron/cxl-Add-function-to-count-regblocks-of-a-given-type/20230325-011827
> git checkout a04f0052a1fa10bda54569c8c7b3ab7fe60ca975
> # save the config file
> mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=parisc olddefconfig
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=parisc SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/cxl/
Wow. This wasn't one of my best :(
Anyhow thanks for the reports + detailed build description.
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303250523.JdddC4Ld-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c: In function 'cpmu_parse_caps':
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:101:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 101 | val = readq(base + CPMU_CAP_REG);
Added include of linux/io-64-non-atomic-lo-hi.h
> | ^~~~~
> | readl
> In file included from <command-line>:
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c: In function 'cpmu_config_get_mask':
> >> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:416:51: error: 'struct perf_event' has no member named 'attr'
> 416 | return FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(31, 0), event->attr.config);
Added depends on PERF_EVENTS
which I'd missed because it comes for free if a driver is under the drivers/perf/Kconfig menu.
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:578:24: note: in expansion of macro 'GENMASK'
> 578 | writeq(GENMASK(63, 0), base + CPMU_FREEZE_REG);
GENMASK_ULL() here and a couple of other places where it's not a compile
time constant.
> >> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:632:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'local64_set'; did you mean 'local_set'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 632 | local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, 0);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | local_set
...
> >> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:636:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'local64_read'; did you mean 'local_read'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 636 | prev_cnt = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> | local_read
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:636:45: error: 'struct hw_perf_event' has no member named 'prev_count'
> 636 | prev_cnt = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
> | ^~
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.c:637:61: error: 'struct hw_perf_event' has no member named 'idx'
> 637 | writeq(prev_cnt, base + CPMU_COUNTER_REG(hwc->idx));
> | ^~
> drivers/cxl/cpmu.h:46:63: note: in definition of macro 'CPMU_COUNTER_REG'
> 46 | #define CPMU_COUNTER_REG(n) (0xc00 + 8 * (n))
> | ^
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 17:13 [PATCH v2 0/5] CXL 3.0 Performance Monitoring Unit support Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-24 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cxl: Add function to count regblocks of a given type Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-24 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-27 17:04 ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-28 10:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-28 11:01 ` Greg KH
2023-03-29 8:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-29 9:03 ` Greg KH
2023-03-24 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cxl/pci: Find and register CXL PMU devices Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-24 21:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-27 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-24 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cxl: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-24 21:12 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-27 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-03-24 21:42 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-24 22:03 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-24 22:03 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-27 17:07 ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-29 13:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-24 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] docs: perf: Minimal introduction the the CXL PMU device and driver Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230327165038.00002037@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.