All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ebiggers@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	heinzm@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	nhuck@google.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ejt@redhat.com,
	mpatocka@redhat.com, luomeng12@huawei.com
Subject: [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 17/20] dm bufio: prepare to intelligently size dm_buffer_cache's buffer_trees
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:11:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230327201143.51026-18-snitzer@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327201143.51026-1-snitzer@kernel.org>

Add num_locks member to dm_buffer_cache struct and use it rather than
the NR_LOCKS magic value (64).

Next commit will size the dm_buffer_cache's buffer_trees according to
dm_num_sharded_locks().

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index ae552644a0b4..2250799a70e4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -380,7 +380,6 @@ struct dm_buffer {
  */
 
 #define NR_LOCKS 64
-#define LOCKS_MASK (NR_LOCKS - 1)
 
 struct buffer_tree {
 	struct rw_semaphore lock;
@@ -388,37 +387,38 @@ struct buffer_tree {
 } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 struct dm_buffer_cache {
+	struct lru lru[LIST_SIZE];
 	/*
 	 * We spread entries across multiple trees to reduce contention
 	 * on the locks.
 	 */
+	unsigned int num_locks;
 	struct buffer_tree trees[NR_LOCKS];
-	struct lru lru[LIST_SIZE];
 };
 
-static inline unsigned int cache_index(sector_t block)
+static inline unsigned int cache_index(sector_t block, unsigned int num_locks)
 {
-	return block & LOCKS_MASK;
+	return block & (num_locks - 1);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_read_lock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	down_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	down_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_read_unlock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	up_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	up_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_write_lock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	down_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	down_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_write_unlock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	up_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	up_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -429,13 +429,15 @@ struct lock_history {
 	struct dm_buffer_cache *cache;
 	bool write;
 	unsigned int previous;
+	unsigned int no_previous;
 };
 
 static void lh_init(struct lock_history *lh, struct dm_buffer_cache *cache, bool write)
 {
 	lh->cache = cache;
 	lh->write = write;
-	lh->previous = NR_LOCKS;  /* indicates no previous */
+	lh->no_previous = cache->num_locks;
+	lh->previous = lh->no_previous;
 }
 
 static void __lh_lock(struct lock_history *lh, unsigned int index)
@@ -459,9 +461,9 @@ static void __lh_unlock(struct lock_history *lh, unsigned int index)
  */
 static void lh_exit(struct lock_history *lh)
 {
-	if (lh->previous != NR_LOCKS) {
+	if (lh->previous != lh->no_previous) {
 		__lh_unlock(lh, lh->previous);
-		lh->previous = NR_LOCKS;
+		lh->previous = lh->no_previous;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -471,9 +473,9 @@ static void lh_exit(struct lock_history *lh)
  */
 static void lh_next(struct lock_history *lh, sector_t b)
 {
-	unsigned int index = cache_index(b);
+	unsigned int index = cache_index(b, lh->no_previous); /* no_previous is num_locks */
 
-	if (lh->previous != NR_LOCKS) {
+	if (lh->previous != lh->no_previous) {
 		if (lh->previous != index) {
 			__lh_unlock(lh, lh->previous);
 			__lh_lock(lh, index);
@@ -500,11 +502,13 @@ static struct dm_buffer *list_to_buffer(struct list_head *l)
 	return le_to_buffer(le);
 }
 
-static void cache_init(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc)
+static void cache_init(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, unsigned int num_locks)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; i++) {
+	bc->num_locks = num_locks;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < bc->num_locks; i++) {
 		init_rwsem(&bc->trees[i].lock);
 		bc->trees[i].root = RB_ROOT;
 	}
@@ -517,7 +521,7 @@ static void cache_destroy(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < bc->num_locks; i++)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bc->trees[i].root));
 
 	lru_destroy(&bc->lru[LIST_CLEAN]);
@@ -576,7 +580,7 @@ static struct dm_buffer *cache_get(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 	struct dm_buffer *b;
 
 	cache_read_lock(bc, block);
-	b = __cache_get(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].root, block);
+	b = __cache_get(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].root, block);
 	if (b) {
 		lru_reference(&b->lru);
 		__cache_inc_buffer(b);
@@ -650,7 +654,7 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__cache_evict(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, int list_mode
 
 	b = le_to_buffer(le);
 	/* __evict_pred will have locked the appropriate tree. */
-	rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block)].root);
+	rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block, bc->num_locks)].root);
 
 	return b;
 }
@@ -816,7 +820,7 @@ static bool cache_insert(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, struct dm_buffer *b)
 
 	cache_write_lock(bc, b->block);
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&b->hold_count) != 1);
-	r = __cache_insert(&bc->trees[cache_index(b->block)].root, b);
+	r = __cache_insert(&bc->trees[cache_index(b->block, bc->num_locks)].root, b);
 	if (r)
 		lru_insert(&bc->lru[b->list_mode], &b->lru);
 	cache_write_unlock(bc, b->block);
@@ -842,7 +846,7 @@ static bool cache_remove(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, struct dm_buffer *b)
 		r = false;
 	} else {
 		r = true;
-		rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block)].root);
+		rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block, bc->num_locks)].root);
 		lru_remove(&bc->lru[b->list_mode], &b->lru);
 	}
 
@@ -911,7 +915,7 @@ static void cache_remove_range(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc,
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < bc->num_locks; i++) {
 		down_write(&bc->trees[i].lock);
 		__remove_range(bc, &bc->trees[i].root, begin, end, pred, release);
 		up_write(&bc->trees[i].lock);
@@ -2432,7 +2436,7 @@ struct dm_bufio_client *dm_bufio_client_create(struct block_device *bdev, unsign
 		r = -ENOMEM;
 		goto bad_client;
 	}
-	cache_init(&c->cache);
+	cache_init(&c->cache, NR_LOCKS);
 
 	c->bdev = bdev;
 	c->block_size = block_size;
-- 
2.40.0

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, ejt@redhat.com,
	mpatocka@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com, nhuck@google.com,
	ebiggers@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, luomeng12@huawei.com,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Subject: [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 17/20] dm bufio: prepare to intelligently size dm_buffer_cache's buffer_trees
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:11:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230327201143.51026-18-snitzer@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327201143.51026-1-snitzer@kernel.org>

Add num_locks member to dm_buffer_cache struct and use it rather than
the NR_LOCKS magic value (64).

Next commit will size the dm_buffer_cache's buffer_trees according to
dm_num_sharded_locks().

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index ae552644a0b4..2250799a70e4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -380,7 +380,6 @@ struct dm_buffer {
  */
 
 #define NR_LOCKS 64
-#define LOCKS_MASK (NR_LOCKS - 1)
 
 struct buffer_tree {
 	struct rw_semaphore lock;
@@ -388,37 +387,38 @@ struct buffer_tree {
 } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 struct dm_buffer_cache {
+	struct lru lru[LIST_SIZE];
 	/*
 	 * We spread entries across multiple trees to reduce contention
 	 * on the locks.
 	 */
+	unsigned int num_locks;
 	struct buffer_tree trees[NR_LOCKS];
-	struct lru lru[LIST_SIZE];
 };
 
-static inline unsigned int cache_index(sector_t block)
+static inline unsigned int cache_index(sector_t block, unsigned int num_locks)
 {
-	return block & LOCKS_MASK;
+	return block & (num_locks - 1);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_read_lock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	down_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	down_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_read_unlock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	up_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	up_read(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_write_lock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	down_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	down_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 static inline void cache_write_unlock(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 {
-	up_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].lock);
+	up_write(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -429,13 +429,15 @@ struct lock_history {
 	struct dm_buffer_cache *cache;
 	bool write;
 	unsigned int previous;
+	unsigned int no_previous;
 };
 
 static void lh_init(struct lock_history *lh, struct dm_buffer_cache *cache, bool write)
 {
 	lh->cache = cache;
 	lh->write = write;
-	lh->previous = NR_LOCKS;  /* indicates no previous */
+	lh->no_previous = cache->num_locks;
+	lh->previous = lh->no_previous;
 }
 
 static void __lh_lock(struct lock_history *lh, unsigned int index)
@@ -459,9 +461,9 @@ static void __lh_unlock(struct lock_history *lh, unsigned int index)
  */
 static void lh_exit(struct lock_history *lh)
 {
-	if (lh->previous != NR_LOCKS) {
+	if (lh->previous != lh->no_previous) {
 		__lh_unlock(lh, lh->previous);
-		lh->previous = NR_LOCKS;
+		lh->previous = lh->no_previous;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -471,9 +473,9 @@ static void lh_exit(struct lock_history *lh)
  */
 static void lh_next(struct lock_history *lh, sector_t b)
 {
-	unsigned int index = cache_index(b);
+	unsigned int index = cache_index(b, lh->no_previous); /* no_previous is num_locks */
 
-	if (lh->previous != NR_LOCKS) {
+	if (lh->previous != lh->no_previous) {
 		if (lh->previous != index) {
 			__lh_unlock(lh, lh->previous);
 			__lh_lock(lh, index);
@@ -500,11 +502,13 @@ static struct dm_buffer *list_to_buffer(struct list_head *l)
 	return le_to_buffer(le);
 }
 
-static void cache_init(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc)
+static void cache_init(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, unsigned int num_locks)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; i++) {
+	bc->num_locks = num_locks;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < bc->num_locks; i++) {
 		init_rwsem(&bc->trees[i].lock);
 		bc->trees[i].root = RB_ROOT;
 	}
@@ -517,7 +521,7 @@ static void cache_destroy(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < bc->num_locks; i++)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bc->trees[i].root));
 
 	lru_destroy(&bc->lru[LIST_CLEAN]);
@@ -576,7 +580,7 @@ static struct dm_buffer *cache_get(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, sector_t block)
 	struct dm_buffer *b;
 
 	cache_read_lock(bc, block);
-	b = __cache_get(&bc->trees[cache_index(block)].root, block);
+	b = __cache_get(&bc->trees[cache_index(block, bc->num_locks)].root, block);
 	if (b) {
 		lru_reference(&b->lru);
 		__cache_inc_buffer(b);
@@ -650,7 +654,7 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__cache_evict(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, int list_mode
 
 	b = le_to_buffer(le);
 	/* __evict_pred will have locked the appropriate tree. */
-	rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block)].root);
+	rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block, bc->num_locks)].root);
 
 	return b;
 }
@@ -816,7 +820,7 @@ static bool cache_insert(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, struct dm_buffer *b)
 
 	cache_write_lock(bc, b->block);
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&b->hold_count) != 1);
-	r = __cache_insert(&bc->trees[cache_index(b->block)].root, b);
+	r = __cache_insert(&bc->trees[cache_index(b->block, bc->num_locks)].root, b);
 	if (r)
 		lru_insert(&bc->lru[b->list_mode], &b->lru);
 	cache_write_unlock(bc, b->block);
@@ -842,7 +846,7 @@ static bool cache_remove(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc, struct dm_buffer *b)
 		r = false;
 	} else {
 		r = true;
-		rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block)].root);
+		rb_erase(&b->node, &bc->trees[cache_index(b->block, bc->num_locks)].root);
 		lru_remove(&bc->lru[b->list_mode], &b->lru);
 	}
 
@@ -911,7 +915,7 @@ static void cache_remove_range(struct dm_buffer_cache *bc,
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < bc->num_locks; i++) {
 		down_write(&bc->trees[i].lock);
 		__remove_range(bc, &bc->trees[i].root, begin, end, pred, release);
 		up_write(&bc->trees[i].lock);
@@ -2432,7 +2436,7 @@ struct dm_bufio_client *dm_bufio_client_create(struct block_device *bdev, unsign
 		r = -ENOMEM;
 		goto bad_client;
 	}
-	cache_init(&c->cache);
+	cache_init(&c->cache, NR_LOCKS);
 
 	c->bdev = bdev;
 	c->block_size = block_size;
-- 
2.40.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-27 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-27 20:11 [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 00/20] dm bufio, thin: improve concurrent IO performance Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 01/20] dm bufio: remove unused dm_bufio_release_move interface Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 02/20] dm bufio: use WARN_ON in dm_bufio_client_destroy and dm_bufio_exit Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 03/20] dm bufio: never crash if dm_bufio_in_request() Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 04/20] dm bufio: don't bug for clear developer oversight Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 05/20] dm bufio: add LRU abstraction Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 06/20] dm bufio: add dm_buffer_cache abstraction Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 07/20] dm bufio: improve concurrent IO performance Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 08/20] dm bufio: add lock_history optimization for cache iterators Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 09/20] dm bufio: move dm_bufio_client members to avoid spanning cachelines Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 10/20] dm bufio: use waitqueue_active in __free_buffer_wake Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 11/20] dm bufio: use multi-page bio vector Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 12/20] dm thin: speed up cell_defer_no_holder() Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 13/20] dm: split discards further if target sets max_discard_granularity Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 14/20] dm bio prison v1: improve concurrent IO performance Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 15/20] dm bio prison v1: add dm_cell_key_has_valid_range Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 16/20] dm: add dm_num_sharded_locks() Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2023-03-27 20:11   ` [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 17/20] dm bufio: prepare to intelligently size dm_buffer_cache's buffer_trees Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 18/20] dm bufio: " Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 19/20] dm bio prison v1: prepare to intelligently size dm_bio_prison's prison_regions Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11 ` [dm-devel] [dm-6.4 PATCH v3 20/20] dm bio prison v1: " Mike Snitzer
2023-03-27 20:11   ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230327201143.51026-18-snitzer@kernel.org \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=ejt@redhat.com \
    --cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luomeng12@huawei.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=nhuck@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.