On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:16:39PM +1300, Simon Glass wrote: > It doesn't really matter if we mention things which are not present. For > example, if 'nvme' is included but the board does not support it, we get > a message like: > > Unknown uclass 'nvme' in label > > This seems tolerable. If it creates confusion we could perhaps find a way > to avoid the message, e.g. by maintaining a list of uclasses which may > be missing from the build and supressing warnings about them. > > It is simpler to use the same target list for all boards, so drop the > different one for rk3399. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Perhaps "bootflow scan -v" should print that, but normally we don't? And a "bootflow scan .." that finds nothing should suggest trying passing -v to see some possible errors. -- Tom