All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove PASID supervisor request support
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:11:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230331231137.1947675-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230331231137.1947675-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

There's no more usage,  remove PASID supervisor support.

Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 43 -------------------------------------
 drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h |  7 ------
 2 files changed, 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
index 633e0a4a01e7..c5d479770e12 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
@@ -335,15 +335,6 @@ static inline void pasid_set_fault_enable(struct pasid_entry *pe)
 	pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[0], 1 << 1, 0);
 }
 
-/*
- * Setup the SRE(Supervisor Request Enable) field (Bit 128) of a
- * scalable mode PASID entry.
- */
-static inline void pasid_set_sre(struct pasid_entry *pe)
-{
-	pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[2], 1 << 0, 1);
-}
-
 /*
  * Setup the WPE(Write Protect Enable) field (Bit 132) of a
  * scalable mode PASID entry.
@@ -521,23 +512,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (flags & PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-		unsigned long cr0 = read_cr0();
-
-		/* CR0.WP is normally set but just to be sure */
-		if (unlikely(!(cr0 & X86_CR0_WP))) {
-			pr_err("No CPU write protect!\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-#endif
-		if (!ecap_srs(iommu->ecap)) {
-			pr_err("No supervisor request support on %s\n",
-			       iommu->name);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	}
-
 	if ((flags & PASID_FLAG_FL5LP) && !cap_fl5lp_support(iommu->cap)) {
 		pr_err("No 5-level paging support for first-level on %s\n",
 		       iommu->name);
@@ -560,10 +534,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 
 	/* Setup the first level page table pointer: */
 	pasid_set_flptr(pte, (u64)__pa(pgd));
-	if (flags & PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) {
-		pasid_set_sre(pte);
-		pasid_set_wpe(pte);
-	}
 
 	if (flags & PASID_FLAG_FL5LP)
 		pasid_set_flpm(pte, 1);
@@ -658,12 +628,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_second_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
 	pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
 
-	/*
-	 * Since it is a second level only translation setup, we should
-	 * set SRE bit as well (addresses are expected to be GPAs).
-	 */
-	if (pasid != PASID_RID2PASID && ecap_srs(iommu->ecap))
-		pasid_set_sre(pte);
 	pasid_set_present(pte);
 	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 
@@ -700,13 +664,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	pasid_set_translation_type(pte, PASID_ENTRY_PGTT_PT);
 	pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
 	pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
-
-	/*
-	 * We should set SRE bit as well since the addresses are expected
-	 * to be GPAs.
-	 */
-	if (ecap_srs(iommu->ecap))
-		pasid_set_sre(pte);
 	pasid_set_present(pte);
 	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
index 20c54e50f533..d6b7d21244b1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h
@@ -41,13 +41,6 @@
 #define FLPT_DEFAULT_DID		1
 #define NUM_RESERVED_DID		2
 
-/*
- * The SUPERVISOR_MODE flag indicates a first level translation which
- * can be used for access to kernel addresses. It is valid only for
- * access to the kernel's static 1:1 mapping of physical memory — not
- * to vmalloc or even module mappings.
- */
-#define PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE	BIT(0)
 #define PASID_FLAG_NESTED		BIT(1)
 #define PASID_FLAG_PAGE_SNOOP		BIT(2)
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-31 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31 23:11 [PATCH v3 0/7] Re-enable IDXD kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Use non-privileged mode for all PASIDs Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:41   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-31 23:11 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iommu/sva: Support allocation of global PASIDs outside SVA Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:16   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 20:44     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:28   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 20:55     ` Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Reserve RID_PASID from global PASID space Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:43   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 21:40     ` Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Make device pasid attachment explicit Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev_pasid domain op Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:48   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 21:48     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-04  5:24       ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-31 23:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] dmaengine/idxd: Re-enable kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan
2023-03-31 23:31   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-04-03 21:56     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-01 13:39   ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-03 21:54     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-05 12:15   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-04-06  2:49     ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-06 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Re-enable IDXD " Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230331231137.1947675-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.