From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] dma-buf/dma-fence: Introduce long-running completion fences
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 13:18:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202304041357.LFldN2km-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230404002211.3611376-9-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Hi Matthew,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.3-rc5 next-20230403]
[cannot apply to drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/drm-sched-Convert-drm-scheduler-to-use-a-work-queue-rather-than-kthread/20230404-082438
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404002211.3611376-9-matthew.brost%40intel.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 08/10] dma-buf/dma-fence: Introduce long-running completion fences
config: i386-randconfig-a001-20230403 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230404/202304041357.LFldN2km-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/94ca4354f6c367597cebe876cbe493c8c0802dff
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Matthew-Brost/drm-sched-Convert-drm-scheduler-to-use-a-work-queue-rather-than-kthread/20230404-082438
git checkout 94ca4354f6c367597cebe876cbe493c8c0802dff
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/dma-buf/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304041357.LFldN2km-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:376: warning: expecting prototype for dma_fence_lr begin_signalling - begin a critical long(). Prototype was for dma_fence_lr_begin_signalling() instead
vim +376 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
360
361 /**
362 * dma_fence_lr begin_signalling - begin a critical long-running DMA fence
363 * signalling section
364 *
365 * Drivers should use this to annotate the beginning of any code section
366 * required to eventually complete &dma_fence by calling dma_fence_signal().
367 *
368 * The end of these critical sections are annotated with
369 * dma_fence_lr_end_signalling(). Ideally the section should encompass all
370 * locks that are ever required to signal a long-running dma-fence.
371 *
372 * Return: An opaque cookie needed by the implementation, which needs to be
373 * passed to dma_fence_lr end_signalling().
374 */
375 bool dma_fence_lr_begin_signalling(void)
> 376 {
377 return __dma_fence_begin_signalling(&dma_fence_lr_lockdep_map);
378 }
379 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_lr_begin_signalling);
380
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-04 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 176+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-04 0:22 [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 00/10] Xe DRM scheduler and long running workload plans Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 01/10] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-09 6:58 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-06-09 6:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-07-31 0:56 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-07-31 0:56 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 02/10] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler / entity Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 7:24 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-05 17:37 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-04-05 17:37 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-05 18:29 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-05 18:29 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 03/10] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 04/10] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-04 5:28 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-05-04 5:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-07-31 2:42 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-07-31 2:42 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 05/10] drm/sched: Start run wq before TDR in drm_sched_start Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 06/10] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-04 5:23 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-05-04 5:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-07-31 1:00 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-07-31 1:00 ` Matthew Brost
2023-07-31 7:26 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-07-31 7:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-08-31 19:48 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-08-31 19:48 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 07/10] drm/sched: Add helper to set TDR timeout Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-04 5:28 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-05-04 5:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-07-31 1:09 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-07-31 1:09 ` Matthew Brost
2023-08-31 19:52 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-08-31 19:52 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 08/10] dma-buf/dma-fence: Introduce long-running completion fences Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 5:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-04-04 9:09 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-04 9:09 ` Christian König
2023-04-04 12:54 ` [Intel-xe] " Thomas Hellström
2023-04-04 12:54 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-04-04 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-04 13:10 ` Christian König
2023-04-04 18:14 ` [Intel-xe] " Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2023-04-04 18:14 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2023-04-04 19:02 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 19:02 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 19:25 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 19:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 19:48 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 19:48 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-05 13:09 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 13:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 23:58 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-05 23:58 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-06 6:32 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 6:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 16:58 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-06 16:58 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-06 17:09 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 17:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 12:35 ` [Intel-xe] " Thomas Hellström
2023-04-05 12:35 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-04-05 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-05 12:39 ` Christian König
2023-04-05 12:45 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 14:08 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-05 14:08 ` Christian König
2023-04-04 19:00 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 19:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:03 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 20:03 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 20:11 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:19 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 20:19 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 20:31 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:46 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 20:46 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 14:45 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 09/10] drm/sched: Support long-running sched entities Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 10/10] drm/syncobj: Warn on long running dma-fences Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 0:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Xe DRM scheduler and long running workload plans Patchwork
2023-04-04 1:07 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 00/10] " Asahi Lina
2023-04-04 1:07 ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-04 1:58 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 1:58 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-08 7:05 ` [Intel-xe] " Asahi Lina
2023-04-08 7:05 ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-11 14:07 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-11 14:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-12 5:47 ` [Intel-xe] " Asahi Lina
2023-04-12 5:47 ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-12 8:18 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-12 8:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-17 0:03 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-17 0:03 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 9:04 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-04 9:04 ` Christian König
2023-04-04 13:23 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 13:23 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 9:13 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-04 9:13 ` Christian König
2023-04-04 13:37 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 13:37 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-05 7:41 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-05 7:41 ` Christian König
2023-04-05 8:34 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 8:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 8:53 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-05 8:53 ` Christian König
2023-04-05 9:07 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 9:57 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-05 9:57 ` Christian König
2023-04-05 10:12 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 10:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 2:08 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-06 2:08 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-06 6:37 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 6:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 10:14 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-06 10:14 ` Christian König
2023-04-06 10:32 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 10:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 9:43 ` [Intel-xe] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-04-04 9:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-04-04 9:48 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-04 9:48 ` Christian König
2023-04-04 13:43 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 13:43 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 13:52 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 13:52 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 17:29 ` [Intel-xe] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-04-04 17:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-04-04 19:07 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 18:02 ` [Intel-xe] " Zeng, Oak
2023-04-04 18:02 ` Zeng, Oak
2023-04-04 18:08 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-04 18:08 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-05 7:30 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-05 7:30 ` Christian König
2023-04-05 8:42 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 8:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 18:06 ` [Intel-xe] " Zeng, Oak
2023-04-05 18:06 ` Zeng, Oak
2023-04-05 18:53 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-04-05 18:53 ` Matthew Brost
2023-04-06 10:04 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-06 10:04 ` Christian König
2023-04-07 0:20 ` [Intel-xe] " Zeng, Oak
2023-04-07 0:20 ` Zeng, Oak
2023-04-11 9:02 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-11 9:02 ` Christian König
2023-04-11 14:13 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-11 14:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-17 6:47 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-04-17 6:47 ` Christian König
2023-04-17 8:39 ` [Intel-xe] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-17 8:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-18 15:10 ` [Intel-xe] " Liviu Dudau
2023-04-18 15:10 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202304041357.LFldN2km-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.