From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anisinha@redhat.com, jusual@redhat.com,
kraxel@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: pcihp: make pending delete expire in 5sec
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 08:27:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230405082425-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405140332.2dd50298@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 05:59:06 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:24:16AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > > PS:
> > > > > See commit message, Windows is not affected as it doesn't
> > > > > clear GPE status bits during ACPI initialization
> > > > > (at least the one version I've tested with, and I won't bet
> > > > > on this with other versions or staying this way)
> > > >
> > > > So I am saying linux should match windows. Clearing GPE
> > > > is a bad idea as you then miss events.
> > >
> > > I'd say it depends on if guest OS is able to handle hot[un]plug
> > > at boot time when it enables GPE handlers (or any other time).
> > > (My point of view here, it's a guest OS policy and management
> > > layer should know what installed guest is capable of and what
> > > quirks to use with it)
> > >
> > > I'll try to send a kernel patch to remove GPEx.status clearing,
> > > though it might be more complex than it seems,
> > > hence I'm quite sceptical about it.
> >
> > In the world of ACPI, windows is basically the gold standard,
> > whatever it does linux has to do ;)
> I'd say other way around (with their limited acpi interpreter,
> it's getting better though),
> While linux basically is acpica reference code.
For a spec compliant acpi like ours maybe but on real hardware
it is like this because BIOS vendors test their ACPI with windows only.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 16:16 [PATCH] acpi: pcihp: make pending delete expire in 5sec Igor Mammedov
2023-04-03 17:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-04 7:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-04-04 7:36 ` Ani Sinha
2023-04-04 12:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-04 13:56 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-04 8:30 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-04 10:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-04-06 11:46 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-06 12:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-04-04 8:28 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-04 12:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-04 14:04 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-04 14:10 ` Ani Sinha
2023-04-04 14:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-04 14:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 7:30 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-05 8:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 9:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-05 9:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 12:03 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-05 12:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-04-05 12:32 ` Ani Sinha
2023-04-04 14:11 ` Ani Sinha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230405082425-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.