From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2989C76196 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229965AbjDKMoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:44:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229692AbjDKMoD (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:44:03 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB943584 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8475A68C7B; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:43:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:43:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Christoph Hellwig , Damien Le Moal , Ming Lei , Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] block: Preserve the order of requeued requests Message-ID: <20230411124358.GC14106@lst.de> References: <20230407235822.1672286-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20230407235822.1672286-7-bvanassche@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230407235822.1672286-7-bvanassche@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org I think this should be merged with the previous patch. > void blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(struct request_queue *q) > { > + blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_kick_requeue_list); Pleae just remove blk_mq_kick_requeue_list entirely. > > > void blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list(struct request_queue *q, > unsigned long msecs) > { > + blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(q, msecs); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list); Same for blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list. > if (!sq_hctx || sq_hctx == hctx || > - !list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch)) > + blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)) > blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, async); > } > } > @@ -2353,7 +2341,7 @@ void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long msecs) > * scheduler. > */ > if (!sq_hctx || sq_hctx == hctx || > - !list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch)) > + blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)) This check would probably benefit from being factored into a helper.