All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [RFC] Define a low power state for devices
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:57:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413115008-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=HUj53_M_H6wC9q8qB5b6HC8n-F7KyOFRsO0qsjDpXWhaS6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:29:43PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:27 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 04:30:02PM +0900, David Stevens wrote:
> > > This RFC defines a low power state for virtio devices, to gives
> > > drivers an option for power management besides simply resetting their
> > > device.
> > >
> > > This patch is a draft aimed at starting a discussion, rather than being
> > > a finalized patch.
> > >
> > > To provide some context on where this is coming from, I'm working on
> > > reducing the power overhead of ARCVM (virtualized Android running on
> > > ChromeOS). One of the big gaps in ARCVM power management is that it does
> > > not implement Android's partial wake locks - i.e. the (virtualized) CPUs
> > > are always on, even if the (virtualized) screen is off. This means we
> > > can't force apps to stop running when they shouldn't be running, which
> > > can lead to higher power consumption compared to the ChromeOS baseline.
> > >
> > > Partial wake locks are built on s2idle, but unfortunately the current
> > > power management of virtio drivers does not let us use s2idle. The fact
> > > that power management is based around resetting the virtio device means
> > > that it doesn't work with stateful devices (e.g. virtio-fs). Even for
> > > stateless devices, re-initializing all of the devices takes longer than
> > > we would like, especially on lower end hardware.
> > >
> > > My rough idea for how to address this would be to make the existing
> > > virtio power management targeted at S4 specifically (i.e. the freeze
> > > device callback). For S0/S1/S3 (i.e. the suspend device callback), this
> > > new lighter weight low power state would be used if available -
> > > otherwise it would fall back to the existing S4 power management code.
> > >
> > > I have a very rough prototype that seems to work, and I haven't seen
> > > anything that makes me think this approach is fundamentally unworkable.
> > > That said, I would like to get feedback on the approach earlier rather
> > > than later.
> > > ---
> > >  content.tex | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> > > index cff548ab9675..01da6f62ef20 100644
> > > --- a/content.tex
> > > +++ b/content.tex
> > > @@ -449,6 +449,28 @@ \section{Exporting Objects}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Expo
> > >  types. It is RECOMMENDED that devices generate version 4
> > >  UUIDs as specified by \hyperref[intro:rfc4122]{[RFC4122]}.
> > >
> > > +\section{Low Power Mode}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Low Power Mode}
> > > +
> > > +A virtio device can be put into a low power state when the
> > > +VIRTIO_F_LOW_POWER bit is negotiated. How a driver puts a
> > > +device into a low power state is transport specific.
> > > +
> > > +In general, a virtio device in a low power state should
> > > +avoid initating any communication with the driver. However,
> > > +certain device-specific functionality is exempt from this
> > > +requirement. Such functionality is detailed in the device
> > > +type specifications.
> > > +
> > > +% One example of such functionality would be allowing
> > > +% the virtio-net device to wake up the guest to deliver
> > > +% incoming network packets.
> > > +
> > > +While a virtio device is in a low power state, it should
> > > +maintain any type specific state in such a way that it is
> > > +able to immediately resume functioning upon leaving the low
> > > +power state, without the need for any additional
> > > +communication with the driver.
> > > +
> > >  \chapter{General Initialization And Device Operation}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation}
> > >
> > >  We start with an overview of device initialization, then expand on the
> > > @@ -803,6 +825,10 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
> > >    that the driver can reset a queue individually.
> > >    See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}.
> > >
> > > +  \item[VIRTIO_F_LOW_POWER(41)] This feature indicates
> > > +  that the driver can put the device into a low power mode.
> > > +  See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Low Power Mode}.
> > > +
> > >  \end{description}
> > >
> > >  \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
> >
> > So what purpose does this flag serve exactly?  I guess transports also
> > provide ways to enumerate supported power states, no?
> 
> This is mostly here to parallel the VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV feature flag.
> Generally speaking, it does seem redundant with the transport-specific
> enumeration.
> 
> The two potential uses I can think of would be to allow devices to
> support transport level power management without supporting virtio
> level power management (might apply to existing devices?) and to allow
> devices to behave differently if they know that the driver doesn't
> support virtio power management. But I don't know how useful these are
> in practice.
> 
> -David

I'm a bit confused by all this. So there are actually two types of PM?
What does initiating communication involve? Is consuming buffers
initiating communication? Sending interrupts?


-- 
MST


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-13 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-06  7:30 [virtio-comment] [RFC] Define a low power state for devices David Stevens
2023-04-06 12:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-04-13  5:47   ` David Stevens
2023-04-07 11:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-13  6:29   ` David Stevens
2023-04-13 15:57     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-04-14  8:03       ` David Stevens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230413115008-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.