From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
oohall@gmail.com, Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@canonical.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Sheng Bi <windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com>,
Ravi Kishore Koppuravuri <ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>,
Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
Yang Su <yang.su@linux.alibaba.com>,
shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/PM: Bail out early in pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() if link is not trained
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:42:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414074238.GA22973@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413101642.8724-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:16:42PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -5037,6 +5037,22 @@ int pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type)
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Everything above is handling the delays mandated by the PCIe r6.0
> + * sec 6.6.1.
> + *
> + * If the port supports active link reporting we now check one more
> + * time if the link is active and if not bail out early with the
> + * assumption that the device is not present anymore.
> + */
> + if (dev->link_active_reporting) {
> + u16 status;
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &status);
> + if (!(status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA))
> + return -ENOTTY;
> + }
> +
> return pci_dev_wait(child, reset_type,
> PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS - delay);
> }
Hm, shouldn't the added code live in the
if (pcie_get_speed_cap(dev) <= PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT)
branch? For the else branch (Gen3+ devices with > 5 GT/s),
we've already waited for the link to become active, so the
additional check seems superfluous. (But maybe I'm missing
something.)
I also note that this documentation change has been dropped
vis-à-vis v1 of the patch, not sure if that's intentional:
- * However, 100 ms is the minimum and the PCIe spec says the
- * software must allow at least 1s before it can determine that the
- * device that did not respond is a broken device. There is
- * evidence that 100 ms is not always enough, for example certain
- * Titan Ridge xHCI controller does not always respond to
- * configuration requests if we only wait for 100 ms (see
- * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203885).
+ * However, 100 ms is the minimum and the PCIe spec says the software
+ * must allow at least 1s before it can determine that the device that
+ * did not respond is a broken device. Also device can take longer than
+ * that to respond if it indicates so through Request Retry Status
+ * completions.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 10:16 [PATCH v3] PCI/PM: Bail out early in pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() if link is not trained Mika Westerberg
2023-04-13 14:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-04-14 7:42 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-04-14 10:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-04-16 7:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-04-17 6:07 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230414074238.GA22973@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chris.chiu@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shuo.tan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
--cc=windy.bi.enflame@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.su@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.