From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, y.liu@naruida.com,
willy@infradead.org, vbabka@suse.cz, stable@vger.kernel.org,
OSalvador@suse.com, mhocko@suse.com, david@redhat.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-page_alloc-skip-regions-with-hugetlbfs-pages-when-allocating-1g-pages.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:45:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230414194532.C332EC433D2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm: page_alloc: skip regions with hugetlbfs pages when allocating 1G pages
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-page_alloc-skip-regions-with-hugetlbfs-pages-when-allocating-1g-pages.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_alloc-skip-regions-with-hugetlbfs-pages-when-allocating-1g-pages.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: mm: page_alloc: skip regions with hugetlbfs pages when allocating 1G pages
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:14:29 +0100
A bug was reported by Yuanxi Liu where allocating 1G pages at runtime is
taking an excessive amount of time for large amounts of memory. Further
testing allocating huge pages that the cost is linear i.e. if allocating
1G pages in batches of 10 then the time to allocate nr_hugepages from
10->20->30->etc increases linearly even though 10 pages are allocated at
each step. Profiles indicated that much of the time is spent checking the
validity within already existing huge pages and then attempting a
migration that fails after isolating the range, draining pages and a whole
lot of other useless work.
Commit eb14d4eefdc4 ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from
pfn_range_valid_contig") removed two checks, one which ignored huge pages
for contiguous allocations as huge pages can sometimes migrate. While
there may be value on migrating a 2M page to satisfy a 1G allocation, it's
potentially expensive if the 1G allocation fails and it's pointless to try
moving a 1G page for a new 1G allocation or scan the tail pages for valid
PFNs.
Reintroduce the PageHuge check and assume any contiguous region with
hugetlbfs pages is unsuitable for a new 1G allocation.
The hpagealloc test allocates huge pages in batches and reports the
average latency per page over time. This test happens just after boot
when fragmentation is not an issue. Units are in milliseconds.
hpagealloc
6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6
vanilla hugeallocrevert-v1r1 hugeallocsimple-v1r2
Min Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%)
1st-qrtle Latency 356.61 ( 0.00%) 5.34 ( 98.50%) 19.85 ( 94.43%)
2nd-qrtle Latency 697.26 ( 0.00%) 5.47 ( 99.22%) 20.44 ( 97.07%)
3rd-qrtle Latency 972.94 ( 0.00%) 5.50 ( 99.43%) 20.81 ( 97.86%)
Max-1 Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%)
Max-5 Latency 82.14 ( 0.00%) 5.11 ( 93.78%) 19.31 ( 76.49%)
Max-10 Latency 150.54 ( 0.00%) 5.20 ( 96.55%) 19.43 ( 87.09%)
Max-90 Latency 1164.45 ( 0.00%) 5.53 ( 99.52%) 20.97 ( 98.20%)
Max-95 Latency 1223.06 ( 0.00%) 5.55 ( 99.55%) 21.06 ( 98.28%)
Max-99 Latency 1278.67 ( 0.00%) 5.57 ( 99.56%) 22.56 ( 98.24%)
Max Latency 1310.90 ( 0.00%) 8.06 ( 99.39%) 26.62 ( 97.97%)
Amean Latency 678.36 ( 0.00%) 5.44 * 99.20%* 20.44 * 96.99%*
6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6
vanilla revert-v1 hugeallocfix-v2
Duration User 0.28 0.27 0.30
Duration System 808.66 17.77 35.99
Duration Elapsed 830.87 18.08 36.33
The vanilla kernel is poor, taking up to 1.3 second to allocate a huge
page and almost 10 minutes in total to run the test. Reverting the
problematic commit reduces it to 8ms at worst and the patch takes 26ms.
This patch fixes the main issue with skipping huge pages but leaves the
page_count() out because a page with an elevated count potentially can
migrate.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217022
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414141429.pwgieuwluxwez3rj@techsingularity.net
Fixes: eb14d4eefdc4 ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reported-by: Yuanxi Liu <y.liu@naruida.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-skip-regions-with-hugetlbfs-pages-when-allocating-1g-pages
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -9466,6 +9466,9 @@ static bool pfn_range_valid_contig(struc
if (PageReserved(page))
return false;
+
+ if (PageHuge(page))
+ return false;
}
return true;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mgorman@techsingularity.net are
mm-page_alloc-skip-regions-with-hugetlbfs-pages-when-allocating-1g-pages.patch
reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230414194532.C332EC433D2@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=OSalvador@suse.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=y.liu@naruida.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.