All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@redhat.com, andres@anarazel.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: [backport PATCH 1/2] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:29:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417122943.2155502-2-anders.roxell@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417122943.2155502-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
compilation failures for tools/perf/util/annotate.c, e.g. on debian
unstable.

Relevant binutils commit:

  https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=60a3da00bd5407f07

Wire up the feature test and switch to init_disassemble_info_compat(),
which were introduced in prior commits, fixing the compilation failure.

I verified that perf can still disassemble bpf programs by using bpftrace
under load, recording a perf trace, and then annotating the bpf "function"
with and without the changes. With old binutils there's no change in output
before/after this patch. When comparing the output from old binutils (2.35)
to new bintuils with the patch (upstream snapshot) there are a few output
differences, but they are unrelated to this patch. An example hunk is:

       1.15 :   55:mov    %rbp,%rdx
       0.00 :   58:add    $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdx
       0.00 :   5c:xor    %ecx,%ecx
  -    1.03 :   5e:callq  0xffffffffe12aca3c
  +    1.03 :   5e:call   0xffffffffe12aca3c
       0.00 :   63:xor    %eax,%eax
  -    2.18 :   65:leaveq
  -    2.82 :   66:retq
  +    2.18 :   65:leave
  +    2.82 :   66:ret

Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622181918.ykrs5rsnmx3og4sv@alap3.anarazel.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220801013834.156015-5-andres@anarazel.de
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
---
 tools/perf/Makefile.config | 8 ++++++++
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.config b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
index 3e7706c251e9..55905571f87b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.config
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libpython := $(PYTHON_EMBED_LDOPTS)
 FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libaio = -lrt
 
 FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-four-args = -lbfd -lopcodes -ldl
+FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled = -lbfd -lopcodes -ldl
 
 CORE_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer
 CORE_CFLAGS += -ggdb3
@@ -838,13 +839,16 @@ else
   ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty), 1)
     EXTLIBS += -lbfd -lopcodes -liberty
     FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-four-args += -liberty -ldl
+    FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled += -liberty -ldl
   else
     ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty-z), 1)
       EXTLIBS += -lbfd -lopcodes -liberty -lz
       FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-four-args += -liberty -lz -ldl
+      FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled += -liberty -ldl
     endif
   endif
   $(call feature_check,disassembler-four-args)
+  $(call feature_check,disassembler-init-styled)
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-buildid), 1)
@@ -957,6 +961,10 @@ ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
     CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
 endif
 
+ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-init-styled), 1)
+    CFLAGS += -DDISASM_INIT_STYLED
+endif
+
 ifeq (${IS_64_BIT}, 1)
   ifndef NO_PERF_READ_VDSO32
     $(call feature_check,compile-32)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 308189454788..f2d1741b7610 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1684,6 +1684,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
 #define PACKAGE "perf"
 #include <bfd.h>
 #include <dis-asm.h>
+#include <tools/dis-asm-compat.h>
 
 static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
 				   struct annotate_args *args)
@@ -1726,9 +1727,9 @@ static int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym,
 		ret = errno;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
-			      (fprintf_ftype) fprintf);
-
+	init_disassemble_info_compat(&info, s,
+				     (fprintf_ftype) fprintf,
+				     fprintf_styled);
 	info.arch = bfd_get_arch(bfdf);
 	info.mach = bfd_get_mach(bfdf);
 
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 12:29 [backport PATCH 0/2] stable v5.15, v5.10 and v5.4: fix perf build errors Anders Roxell
2023-04-17 12:29 ` Anders Roxell [this message]
2023-04-17 12:31   ` [backport PATCH 1/2] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils kernel test robot
2023-04-17 17:14   ` Ian Rogers
2023-04-18 16:43     ` Quentin Monnet
2023-04-18 18:04       ` Ian Rogers
2023-04-17 12:29 ` [backport PATCH 2/2] tools build: Add feature test for init_disassemble_info API changes Anders Roxell
2023-04-17 17:18 ` [backport PATCH 0/2] stable v5.15, v5.10 and v5.4: fix perf build errors Ian Rogers
2023-04-18  9:04 ` Greg KH
2023-04-20 18:24   ` Anders Roxell
2023-04-20 20:34     ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230417122943.2155502-2-anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --to=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@debian.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.