All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
	ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, will@kernel.org,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org,
	glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	dinguyen@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dalias@libc.org,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] arm64-drop-ranges-in-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:33:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230418233333.45BE9C433EF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     arm64-drop-ranges-in-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 08:22:21 +0300

It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
management.  Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand implications
of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and ranges don't help
here.

Drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and make its prompt
visible only if EXPERT=y

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-3-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 arch/arm64/Kconfig |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig~arm64-drop-ranges-in-definition-of-arch_force_max_order
+++ a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1487,11 +1487,9 @@ config XEN
 # 16K |       27          |      14      |       13        |         11         |
 # 64K |       29          |      16      |       13        |         13         |
 config ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER
-	int "Maximum zone order" if ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES
+	int "Maximum zone order" if EXPERT && (ARM64_4K_PAGES || ARM64_16K_PAGES)
 	default "13" if ARM64_64K_PAGES
-	range 11 13 if ARM64_16K_PAGES
 	default "11" if ARM64_16K_PAGES
-	range 10 15 if ARM64_4K_PAGES
 	default "10"
 	help
 	  The kernel memory allocator divides physically contiguous memory
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rppt@kernel.org are

arm64-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
csky-drop-arch_force_max_order.patch
ia64-dont-allow-users-to-override-arch_force_max_order.patch
m68k-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
nios2-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
nios2-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch
powerpc-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
powerpc-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch
sh-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
sh-drop-ranges-for-definition-of-arch_force_max_order.patch
sparc-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
xtensa-reword-arch_force_max_order-prompt-and-help-text.patch
mm-move-free_area_empty-to-mm-internalh.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230418233333.45BE9C433EF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.