From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9912C77B73 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 05:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230495AbjDTFBr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 01:01:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230102AbjDTFBq (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 01:01:46 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D80C46AA for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 22:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id BEACA68B05; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:01:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:01:42 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Damien Le Moal Cc: Bart Van Assche , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Damien Le Moal , Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] block: Introduce blk_rq_is_seq_zoned_write() Message-ID: <20230420050142.GB4371@lst.de> References: <20230418224002.1195163-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20230418224002.1195163-4-bvanassche@acm.org> <20230419045000.GA25898@lst.de> <80cf216a-dc41-0673-6d55-adb32ff42e46@acm.org> <3995e9fd-d9b3-feaa-39a7-d3d518468604@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3995e9fd-d9b3-feaa-39a7-d3d518468604@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:03:16AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > Could also have a comment on top of the switch explicitly saying that only WRITE > and WRITE ZEROES need to be checked, and that all other commands, including zone > append writes, do not have strong reordering requirements. This way, no need to > superfluous cases. Yes, I think a good comment would be more useful here.