From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/pci-bridge: Fix release ordering by embedding PCIBridgeWindows within PCIBridge
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:03:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230420160226.0000078f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230420145937.17152-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This was intended to be [RFC] for reasons given below.
+ I failed to CC Thomas who reported the issue. Not my finest hour.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:59:37 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> The lifetime of the PCIBridgeWindows instance accessed via the windows pointer
> in struct PCIBridge is managed separately from the PCIBridge itself.
>
> Triggered by ./qemu-system-x86_64 -M x-remote -display none -monitor stdio
> QEMU monitor: device_add cxl-downstream
>
> In some error handling paths (such as the above due to attaching a cxl-downstream
> port anything other than a cxl-upstream port) the g_free() of the PCIBridge
> windows in pci_bridge_region_cleanup() is called before the final call of
> flatview_uref() in address_space_set_flatview() ultimately from
> drain_call_rcu()
>
> At one stage this resulted in a crash, currently can still be observed using
> valgrind which records a use after free.
>
> When present, only one instance is allocated. pci_bridge_update_mappings()
> can operate directly on an instance rather than creating a new one and
> swapping it in. Thus there appears to be no reason to not directly
> couple the lifetimes of the two structures by embedding the PCIBridgeWindows
> within the PCIBridge removing the need for the problematic separate free.
>
> Patch is same as was posted deep in the discussion.
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230403171232.000020bb@huawei.com/
>
> Posted as an RFC as only lightly tested and I'm not sure what the reasoning
> behind the separation of lifetimes originally was. As such perhaps this is
> not the best route to fixing the issue.
>
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/pci/pci_bridge.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> index dd5af508f9..698fd01ae6 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c
> @@ -184,11 +184,11 @@ static void pci_bridge_init_vga_aliases(PCIBridge *br, PCIBus *parent,
> }
> }
>
> -static PCIBridgeWindows *pci_bridge_region_init(PCIBridge *br)
> +static void pci_bridge_region_init(PCIBridge *br)
> {
> PCIDevice *pd = PCI_DEVICE(br);
> PCIBus *parent = pci_get_bus(pd);
> - PCIBridgeWindows *w = g_new(PCIBridgeWindows, 1);
> + PCIBridgeWindows *w = &br->windows;
> uint16_t cmd = pci_get_word(pd->config + PCI_COMMAND);
>
> pci_bridge_init_alias(br, &w->alias_pref_mem,
> @@ -211,8 +211,6 @@ static PCIBridgeWindows *pci_bridge_region_init(PCIBridge *br)
> cmd & PCI_COMMAND_IO);
>
> pci_bridge_init_vga_aliases(br, parent, w->alias_vga);
> -
> - return w;
> }
>
> static void pci_bridge_region_del(PCIBridge *br, PCIBridgeWindows *w)
> @@ -234,19 +232,17 @@ static void pci_bridge_region_cleanup(PCIBridge *br, PCIBridgeWindows *w)
> object_unparent(OBJECT(&w->alias_vga[QEMU_PCI_VGA_IO_LO]));
> object_unparent(OBJECT(&w->alias_vga[QEMU_PCI_VGA_IO_HI]));
> object_unparent(OBJECT(&w->alias_vga[QEMU_PCI_VGA_MEM]));
> - g_free(w);
> }
>
> void pci_bridge_update_mappings(PCIBridge *br)
> {
> - PCIBridgeWindows *w = br->windows;
> -
> + PCIBridgeWindows *w = &br->windows;
> /* Make updates atomic to: handle the case of one VCPU updating the bridge
> * while another accesses an unaffected region. */
> memory_region_transaction_begin();
> - pci_bridge_region_del(br, br->windows);
> + pci_bridge_region_del(br, w);
> pci_bridge_region_cleanup(br, w);
> - br->windows = pci_bridge_region_init(br);
> + pci_bridge_region_init(br);
> memory_region_transaction_commit();
> }
>
> @@ -385,7 +381,7 @@ void pci_bridge_initfn(PCIDevice *dev, const char *typename)
> sec_bus->address_space_io = &br->address_space_io;
> memory_region_init(&br->address_space_io, OBJECT(br), "pci_bridge_io",
> 4 * GiB);
> - br->windows = pci_bridge_region_init(br);
> + pci_bridge_region_init(br);
> QLIST_INIT(&sec_bus->child);
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&parent->child, sec_bus, sibling);
> }
> @@ -396,8 +392,8 @@ void pci_bridge_exitfn(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> PCIBridge *s = PCI_BRIDGE(pci_dev);
> assert(QLIST_EMPTY(&s->sec_bus.child));
> QLIST_REMOVE(&s->sec_bus, sibling);
> - pci_bridge_region_del(s, s->windows);
> - pci_bridge_region_cleanup(s, s->windows);
> + pci_bridge_region_del(s, &s->windows);
> + pci_bridge_region_cleanup(s, &s->windows);
> /* object_unparent() is called automatically during device deletion */
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> index 01670e9e65..ac75ec0c1b 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> #include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> #include "qom/object.h"
> +#include "qemu/rcu.h"
>
> typedef struct PCIBridgeWindows PCIBridgeWindows;
>
> @@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ struct PCIBridge {
> MemoryRegion address_space_mem;
> MemoryRegion address_space_io;
>
> - PCIBridgeWindows *windows;
> + PCIBridgeWindows windows;
>
> pci_map_irq_fn map_irq;
> const char *bus_name;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-20 14:59 [PATCH] hw/pci-bridge: Fix release ordering by embedding PCIBridgeWindows within PCIBridge Jonathan Cameron via
2023-04-20 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2023-04-21 6:26 ` [RFC PATCH] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-04-21 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230420160226.0000078f@huawei.com \
--to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.