From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
To: <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] io_uring: honor I/O nowait flag for read/write
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:28:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421172822.8053-2-kch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421172822.8053-1-kch@nvidia.com>
When IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK is set on io_kiocb req->flag in io_write() or
io_read() IOCB_NOWAIT is set for kiocb when passed it to the respective
rw_iter callback. This sets REQ_NOWAIT for underlaying I/O. The result
is low level driver always sees block layer request as REQ_NOWAIT even
if user has submitted request with nowait = 0 e.g. fio nowait=0.
That is not consistent behaviour with other fio ioengine such as
libaio as it will issue non REQ_NOWAIT request with REQ_NOWAIT:-
libaio nowait = 0:-
null_blk: fio:null_handle_rq 1288 *NOWAIT=FALSE* REQ_OP_WRITE
libaio nowait = 1:-
null_blk: fio:null_handle_rq 1288 *NOWAIT=TRUE* REQ_OP_WRITE
* Without this patch with fio ioengine io_uring :-
---------------------------------------------------
iouring nowait = 0:-
null_blk: fio:null_handle_rq 1288 *NOWAIT=TRUE* REQ_OP_WRITE
iouring nowait = 1:-
null_blk: fio:null_handle_rq 1288 *NOWAIT=TRUE* REQ_OP_WRITE
* With this patch with fio ioengine io_uring :-
---------------------------------------------------
iouring nowait = 0:-
null_blk: fio:null_handle_rq 1307 *REQ_NOWAIT=FALSE* WRITE
iouring nowait = 1:
null_blk: fio:null_handle_rq 1307 *REQ_NOWAIT=TRUE* WRITE
Instead of only relying on IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK blindly in io_read() and
io_write(), also make sure io_kiocb->io_rw->flags is set to RWF_NOWAIT
before we mark kiocb->ki_flags = IOCB_NOWAIT.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
---
io_uring/rw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 3f118ed46e4f..4b3a2c1df5f2 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
}
req->cqe.res = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
- if (force_nonblock) {
+ if (force_nonblock && (rw->flags & RWF_NOWAIT)) {
/* If the file doesn't support async, just async punt */
if (unlikely(!io_file_supports_nowait(req))) {
ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, s, true);
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
}
req->cqe.res = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
- if (force_nonblock) {
+ if (force_nonblock && (rw->flags & RWF_NOWAIT)) {
/* If the file doesn't support async, just async punt */
if (unlikely(!io_file_supports_nowait(req)))
goto copy_iov;
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 17:28 [RFC PATCH 0/1] io_uring: honor I/O nowait flag for read/write Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-04-21 17:28 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2023-04-21 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230421172822.8053-2-kch@nvidia.com \
--to=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.