From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + nilfs2-do-not-write-dirty-data-after-degenerating-to-read-only.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 13:45:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230502204537.CB66DC433EF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: nilfs2: do not write dirty data after degenerating to read-only
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
nilfs2-do-not-write-dirty-data-after-degenerating-to-read-only.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/nilfs2-do-not-write-dirty-data-after-degenerating-to-read-only.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Subject: nilfs2: do not write dirty data after degenerating to read-only
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:15:26 +0900
According to syzbot's report, mark_buffer_dirty() called from
nilfs_segctor_do_construct() outputs a warning with some patterns after
nilfs2 detects metadata corruption and degrades to read-only mode.
After such read-only degeneration, page cache data may be cleared through
nilfs_clear_dirty_page() which may also clear the uptodate flag for their
buffer heads. However, even after the degeneration, log writes are still
performed by unmount processing etc., which causes mark_buffer_dirty() to
be called for buffer heads without the "uptodate" flag and causes the
warning.
Since any writes should not be done to a read-only file system in the
first place, this fixes the warning in mark_buffer_dirty() by letting
nilfs_segctor_do_construct() abort early if in read-only mode.
This also changes the retry check of nilfs_segctor_write_out() to avoid
unnecessary log write retries if it detects -EROFS that
nilfs_segctor_do_construct() returned.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230427011526.13457-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+2af3bc9585be7f23f290@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2af3bc9585be7f23f290
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c~nilfs2-do-not-write-dirty-data-after-degenerating-to-read-only
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -2041,6 +2041,9 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_do_construct(st
struct the_nilfs *nilfs = sci->sc_super->s_fs_info;
int err;
+ if (sb_rdonly(sci->sc_super))
+ return -EROFS;
+
nilfs_sc_cstage_set(sci, NILFS_ST_INIT);
sci->sc_cno = nilfs->ns_cno;
@@ -2724,7 +2727,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_write_out(stru
flush_work(&sci->sc_iput_work);
- } while (ret && retrycount-- > 0);
+ } while (ret && ret != -EROFS && retrycount-- > 0);
}
/**
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com are
nilfs2-fix-infinite-loop-in-nilfs_mdt_get_block.patch
nilfs2-do-not-write-dirty-data-after-degenerating-to-read-only.patch
reply other threads:[~2023-05-02 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230502204537.CB66DC433EF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.