All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ali Gholami Rudi <aligrudi@gmail.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>,
	<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, <song@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unacceptably Poor RAID1 Performance with Many CPU Cores
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 11:29:54 +0330	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230507112954@laper.mirepesht> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8d9e0e5-d0cc-bed5-8b65-fe9fcc4c7dc4@huawei.com>

Hi,

Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On md0 (40GB):
> > READ:  IOPS=1563K BW=6109MiB/s
> > WRITE: IOPS= 670K BW=2745MiB/s
> > 
> > On md3 (14TB):
> > READ:  IOPS=1177K BW=4599MiB/s
> > WRITE: IOPS= 505K BW=1972MiB/s
> > 
> > On md3 but disabling mdadm bitmap (mdadm --grow --bitmap=none /dev/md3):
> > READ:  IOPS=1351K BW=5278MiB/s
> > WRITE: IOPS= 579K BW=2261MiB/s
> 
> Currently, if bitmap is enabled, a bitmap level spinlock will be grabbed
> for each write, and sadly this will require a huge refactor to improve
> performance.

OK.

> > +   95.25%     0.00%  fio      [unknown]               [k] 0xffffffffffffffff
> > +   95.00%     0.00%  fio      fio                     [.] 0x000055e073fcd117
> > +   93.68%     0.13%  fio      [kernel.kallsyms]       [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> > +   93.54%     0.03%  fio      [kernel.kallsyms]       [k] do_syscall_64
> > +   92.38%     0.03%  fio      libc.so.6               [.] syscall
> > +   92.18%     0.00%  fio      fio                     [.] 0x000055e073fcaceb
> > +   92.18%     0.08%  fio      fio                     [.] td_io_queue
> > +   92.04%     0.02%  fio      fio                     [.] td_io_commit
> > +   91.76%     0.00%  fio      fio                     [.] 0x000055e073fefe5e
> > -   91.76%     0.05%  fio      libaio.so.1.0.2         [.] io_submit
> >     - 91.71% io_submit
> >        - 91.69% syscall
> >           - 91.58% entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> >              - 91.55% do_syscall_64
> >                 - 91.06% __x64_sys_io_submit
> >                    - 90.93% io_submit_one
> >                       - 48.85% aio_write
> >                          - 48.77% ext4_file_write_iter
> >                             - 39.86% iomap_dio_rw
> >                                - 39.85% __iomap_dio_rw
> >                                   - 22.55% blk_finish_plug
> >                                      - 22.55% __blk_flush_plug
> >                                         - 21.67% raid10_unplug
> >                                            - 16.54% submit_bio_noacct_nocheck
> >                                               - 16.44% blk_mq_submit_bio
> >                                                  - 16.17% __rq_qos_throttle
> >                                                     - 16.01% wbt_wait
> 
> You can disable wbt to prevent overhead here.

Very good.  I will give it a try.  And thanks for your time.

Thanks,
Ali


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-05  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-15  7:54 Unacceptably Poor RAID1 Performance with Many CPU Cores Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-15  9:16 ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-15 17:08   ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-15 17:36     ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-16  1:53       ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-16  5:20         ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-15 14:02 ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-16  2:14   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-16  2:34     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-16  5:52     ` Ali Gholami Rudi
     [not found]     ` <20231606091224@laper.mirepesht>
2023-06-16  7:31       ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-16  7:42         ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-16  8:21           ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-16  8:34             ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-16  8:52               ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-16  9:17                 ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-16 11:51                 ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-16 12:27                   ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-18 20:30                     ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-19  1:22                       ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-19  5:19                       ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-06-19  6:53                         ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-21  8:05                     ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-21  8:26                       ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-21  8:55                         ` Xiao Ni
2023-07-01 11:17                         ` Ali Gholami Rudi
2023-07-03 12:39                           ` Yu Kuai
2023-07-05  7:59                             ` Ali Gholami Rudi [this message]
2023-06-21 19:34                       ` Wols Lists
2023-06-23  0:52                         ` Xiao Ni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230507112954@laper.mirepesht \
    --to=aligrudi@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.