All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, saeedm@nvidia.com,
	moshe@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net 3/3] devlink: fix a deadlock with nested instances during namespace remove
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 20:24:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509202444.30436b9f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230509100939.760867-1-jiri@resnulli.us>

On Tue,  9 May 2023 12:09:36 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> The commit 565b4824c39f ("devlink: change port event netdev notifier
> from per-net to global") changed original per-net notifier to be global
> which fixed the issue of non-receiving events of netdev uninit if that
> moved to a different namespace. That worked fine in -net tree.
> 
> However, later on when commit ee75f1fc44dd ("net/mlx5e: Create
> separate devlink instance for ethernet auxiliary device") and
> commit 72ed5d5624af ("net/mlx5: Suspend auxiliary devices only in
> case of PCI device suspend") were merged, a deadlock was introduced
> when removing a namespace with devlink instance with another nested
> instance.
> 
> Here there is the bad flow example resulting in deadlock with mlx5:
> net_cleanup_work -> cleanup_net (takes down_read(&pernet_ops_rwsem) ->
> devlink_pernet_pre_exit() -> devlink_reload() ->
> mlx5_devlink_reload_down() -> mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked() ->
> mlx5_detach_device() -> del_adev() -> mlx5e_remove() ->
> mlx5e_destroy_devlink() -> devlink_free() ->
> unregister_netdevice_notifier() (takes down_write(&pernet_ops_rwsem)

Why don't we have a single, static notifier for all of devlink?
Why the per device/per port notifiers?

We have the devlink port pointer in struct net_device, resolving from
a global event to the correct devlink instance is trivial.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-09 10:09 [patch net 3/3] devlink: fix a deadlock with nested instances during namespace remove Jiri Pirko
2023-05-09 10:09 ` [patch net 1/3] net: allow to ask per-net netdevice notifier to follow netdev dynamically Jiri Pirko
2023-05-09 10:09 ` [patch net 2/3] devlink: make netdev notifier per-port Jiri Pirko
2023-05-09 10:09 ` [patch net 3/3] devlink: change port event netdev notifier to be per-net and following netdev Jiri Pirko
2023-05-09 20:13 ` [patch net 3/3] devlink: fix a deadlock with nested instances during namespace remove Jacob Keller
2023-05-10  3:24 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-05-10  6:11   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-05-10 18:27   ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230509202444.30436b9f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.