From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: accurate reclaim bandwidth for GRUB
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 22:54:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509225417.61d36733@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230509224829.2fb547fd@nowhere>
On Tue, 9 May 2023 22:48:29 +0200
luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2023 15:29:21 -0400
> Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Is this understanding correct?
> > Yes, the above two details are correct. In addition to that, I think
> > the existing equation had a small bug:
> > GRUB paper says, running time is depreciated as
> > "dq = -U dt" where U is running_bw.
> > This is assuming that the whole cpu bandwidth could be reclaimed.
> > But in our case, we cap at Umax. So the equation should be
> > "dq = -(U/Umax) dt"
>
> Yes, this is the approximation I was mentioning... Instead of using a
> division, I approximated it with a different equation using a sum.
Sorry, ignore this comment (and the following); I misinterpreted the
code (and my old notes).
I do not understand why the "max{}" doe not work well, I need to double
think about it.
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-08 16:08 [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: accurate reclaim bandwidth for GRUB Vineeth Pillai
2023-05-08 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: sched/deadline: Update GRUB description Vineeth Pillai
2023-05-10 8:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: accurate reclaim bandwidth for GRUB luca abeni
2023-05-09 19:29 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-09 20:48 ` luca abeni
2023-05-09 20:54 ` luca abeni [this message]
2023-05-10 3:53 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-10 7:07 ` luca abeni
2023-05-10 15:50 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-11 7:37 ` luca abeni
2023-05-11 18:34 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-11 20:03 ` luca abeni
2023-05-11 20:40 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-15 2:56 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230509225417.61d36733@nowhere \
--to=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.