From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: define variables exp_nat_nla_policy and any_addr with CONFIG_NF_NAT
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 10:00:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230514140010.3399219-1-trix@redhat.com> (raw)
gcc with W=1 and ! CONFIG_NF_NAT
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:3463:32: error:
‘exp_nat_nla_policy’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
3463 | static const struct nla_policy exp_nat_nla_policy[CTA_EXPECT_NAT_MAX+1] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:2979:33: error:
‘any_addr’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
2979 | static const union nf_inet_addr any_addr;
| ^~~~~~~~
These variables use is controlled by CONFIG_NF_NAT, so should their definitions.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index d40544cd61a6..69c8c8c7e9b8 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -2976,7 +2976,9 @@ static int ctnetlink_exp_dump_mask(struct sk_buff *skb,
return -1;
}
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
static const union nf_inet_addr any_addr;
+#endif
static __be32 nf_expect_get_id(const struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp)
{
@@ -3460,10 +3462,12 @@ ctnetlink_change_expect(struct nf_conntrack_expect *x,
return 0;
}
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
static const struct nla_policy exp_nat_nla_policy[CTA_EXPECT_NAT_MAX+1] = {
[CTA_EXPECT_NAT_DIR] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[CTA_EXPECT_NAT_TUPLE] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
};
+#endif
static int
ctnetlink_parse_expect_nat(const struct nlattr *attr,
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-14 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-14 14:00 Tom Rix [this message]
2023-05-14 15:17 ` [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: define variables exp_nat_nla_policy and any_addr with CONFIG_NF_NAT Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230514140010.3399219-1-trix@redhat.com \
--to=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.