From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@purestorage.com>,
Randy Jennings <randyj@purestorage.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme: double KA polling frequency to avoid KATO with TBKAS on
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 06:28:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230520042851.GD31780@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518183311.3224326-2-ushankar@purestorage.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:33:09PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> + *
> + * When TBKAS is on, we need to run nvme_keep_alive_work at twice this
> + * frequency, as one command completion can postpone sending a keep alive
> + * command by up to twice the delay between runs.
> */
> static void nvme_queue_keep_alive_work(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> - queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, ctrl->kato * HZ / 2);
> + unsigned long delay = (ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_TBKAS) ?
> + ctrl->kato * HZ / 4 : ctrl->kato * HZ / 2;
> + queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
Kernel coding style wants an empty line after the variable declarations.
I also find the style rather hard to read. Why not:
unsigned long delay = ctrl->kato * HZ / 2;
/*
* When using Traffic Based Keep Alive, we need to run
* nvme_keep_alive_work at twice the normal frequency, as one command
* completion can postpone sending a keep alive command by up to
* twice the delay between runs.
*/
if (ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_TBKAS)
delay /= 2;
queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
That's not quite as dense, but relaly gets the point across to the
reader much better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-20 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 18:33 [PATCH v3 0/3] keepalive bugfixes Uday Shankar
2023-05-18 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme: double KA polling frequency to avoid KATO with TBKAS on Uday Shankar
2023-05-20 4:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-05-18 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme: check IO start time when deciding to defer KA Uday Shankar
2023-05-20 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-24 19:53 ` Uday Shankar
2023-05-18 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives Uday Shankar
2023-05-20 4:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230520042851.GD31780@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=costa@purestorage.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.