From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Haibo Li <haibo.li@mediatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 1/4] ARM: 9295/1: unwind:fix unwind abort for uleb128 case
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 14:24:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230520182432.866012-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Haibo Li <haibo.li@mediatek.com>
[ Upstream commit fa3eeb638de0c1a9d2d860e5b48259facdd65176 ]
When unwind instruction is 0xb2,the subsequent instructions
are uleb128 bytes.
For now,it uses only the first uleb128 byte in code.
For vsp increments of 0x204~0x400,use one uleb128 byte like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: 0x80b27fac
Compact model index: 0
0xb2 0x7f vsp = vsp + 1024
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
For vsp increments larger than 0x400,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
Compact model index: 1
0xb2 0x81 0x01 vsp = vsp + 1032
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
The unwind works well since the decoded uleb128 byte is also 0x81.
For vsp increments larger than 0x600,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
Compact model index: 1
0xb2 0x81 0x02 vsp = vsp + 1544
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
In this case,the decoded uleb128 result is 0x101(vsp=0x204+(0x101<<2)).
While the uleb128 used in code is 0x81(vsp=0x204+(0x81<<2)).
The unwind aborts at this frame since it gets incorrect vsp.
To fix this,add uleb128 decode to cover all the above case.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Li <haibo.li@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 314cfb232a635..f2bb090373c67 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -313,6 +313,29 @@ static int unwind_exec_pop_subset_r0_to_r3(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl,
return URC_OK;
}
+static unsigned long unwind_decode_uleb128(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl)
+{
+ unsigned long bytes = 0;
+ unsigned long insn;
+ unsigned long result = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * unwind_get_byte() will advance `ctrl` one instruction at a time, so
+ * loop until we get an instruction byte where bit 7 is not set.
+ *
+ * Note: This decodes a maximum of 4 bytes to output 28 bits data where
+ * max is 0xfffffff: that will cover a vsp increment of 1073742336, hence
+ * it is sufficient for unwinding the stack.
+ */
+ do {
+ insn = unwind_get_byte(ctrl);
+ result |= (insn & 0x7f) << (bytes * 7);
+ bytes++;
+ } while (!!(insn & 0x80) && (bytes != sizeof(result)));
+
+ return result;
+}
+
/*
* Execute the current unwind instruction.
*/
@@ -366,7 +389,7 @@ static int unwind_exec_insn(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl)
if (ret)
goto error;
} else if (insn == 0xb2) {
- unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_get_byte(ctrl);
+ unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_decode_uleb128(ctrl);
ctrl->vrs[SP] += 0x204 + (uleb128 << 2);
} else {
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Haibo Li <haibo.li@mediatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 1/4] ARM: 9295/1: unwind:fix unwind abort for uleb128 case
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 14:24:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230520182432.866012-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Haibo Li <haibo.li@mediatek.com>
[ Upstream commit fa3eeb638de0c1a9d2d860e5b48259facdd65176 ]
When unwind instruction is 0xb2,the subsequent instructions
are uleb128 bytes.
For now,it uses only the first uleb128 byte in code.
For vsp increments of 0x204~0x400,use one uleb128 byte like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: 0x80b27fac
Compact model index: 0
0xb2 0x7f vsp = vsp + 1024
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
For vsp increments larger than 0x400,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
Compact model index: 1
0xb2 0x81 0x01 vsp = vsp + 1032
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
The unwind works well since the decoded uleb128 byte is also 0x81.
For vsp increments larger than 0x600,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
Compact model index: 1
0xb2 0x81 0x02 vsp = vsp + 1544
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
In this case,the decoded uleb128 result is 0x101(vsp=0x204+(0x101<<2)).
While the uleb128 used in code is 0x81(vsp=0x204+(0x81<<2)).
The unwind aborts at this frame since it gets incorrect vsp.
To fix this,add uleb128 decode to cover all the above case.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Li <haibo.li@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 314cfb232a635..f2bb090373c67 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -313,6 +313,29 @@ static int unwind_exec_pop_subset_r0_to_r3(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl,
return URC_OK;
}
+static unsigned long unwind_decode_uleb128(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl)
+{
+ unsigned long bytes = 0;
+ unsigned long insn;
+ unsigned long result = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * unwind_get_byte() will advance `ctrl` one instruction at a time, so
+ * loop until we get an instruction byte where bit 7 is not set.
+ *
+ * Note: This decodes a maximum of 4 bytes to output 28 bits data where
+ * max is 0xfffffff: that will cover a vsp increment of 1073742336, hence
+ * it is sufficient for unwinding the stack.
+ */
+ do {
+ insn = unwind_get_byte(ctrl);
+ result |= (insn & 0x7f) << (bytes * 7);
+ bytes++;
+ } while (!!(insn & 0x80) && (bytes != sizeof(result)));
+
+ return result;
+}
+
/*
* Execute the current unwind instruction.
*/
@@ -366,7 +389,7 @@ static int unwind_exec_insn(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl)
if (ret)
goto error;
} else if (insn == 0xb2) {
- unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_get_byte(ctrl);
+ unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_decode_uleb128(ctrl);
ctrl->vrs[SP] += 0x204 + (uleb128 << 2);
} else {
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-20 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-20 18:24 Sasha Levin [this message]
2023-05-20 18:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 1/4] ARM: 9295/1: unwind:fix unwind abort for uleb128 case Sasha Levin
2023-05-20 18:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 2/4] fbdev: modedb: Add 1920x1080 at 60 Hz video mode Sasha Levin
2023-05-20 18:24 ` Sasha Levin
2023-05-20 18:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 3/4] fbdev: stifb: Fix info entry in sti_struct on error path Sasha Levin
2023-05-20 18:24 ` Sasha Levin
2023-05-20 18:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 4/4] nbd: Fix debugfs_create_dir error checking Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230520182432.866012-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com \
--cc=amergnat@baylibre.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=haibo.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.