From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EFEC77B7A for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 06:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235902AbjEXGOB (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2023 02:14:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49408 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231889AbjEXGOA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2023 02:14:00 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32294132 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 23:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9E94F68CFE; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:13:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 08:13:56 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer , Damien Le Moal , Jaegeuk Kim , Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] block: Make it easier to debug zoned write reordering Message-ID: <20230524061356.GE19611@lst.de> References: <20230522183845.354920-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20230522183845.354920-5-bvanassche@acm.org> <20230523071957.GD8758@lst.de> <41dd1a93-2491-a094-dc61-f424b51af6cb@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41dd1a93-2491-a094-dc61-f424b51af6cb@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:34:38PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> What makes sequential writes here special vs other requests that are >> supposed to be using the scheduler and not a bypass? > > Hi Christoph, > > If some REQ_OP_WRITE or REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES requests are submitted to the > I/O scheduler and others bypass the I/O scheduler this may lead to > reordering. Hence this patch that triggers a kernel warning if any > REQ_OP_WRITE or REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES requests bypass the I/O scheduler. But why would we ever do a direct insert when using a scheduler for write (an read for that matter) commands when not on a zoned device?