From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F173C77B73 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 54F20900002; Wed, 24 May 2023 04:36:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4FED96B007B; Wed, 24 May 2023 04:36:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3C661900002; Wed, 24 May 2023 04:36:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4F06B0078 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 04:36:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5891A08F2 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:35:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80824490796.08.D17666D Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890F1100002 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=KA2hy76e; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1684917355; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=M9GEko9GId8Ah0XxFxVls+S0k/Awv9tiXxZBumopNE4=; b=Aqbfvz6yJGKQSWmIr5pV4WmSx+WUOce7vBfplOvbc/2hf/8u0htntdpZm/v2ol38ayEit8 H0079AaVakqWgdvL79yoFmrdZDeLBDSvQa3MitcnfWIjRhuZfb06AHz21UV6avG9muEpgD Qv2/ThFRwBwiX8xq+Sk9D5lUZ7r+yB4= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1684917355; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XuaZUy4oDwlTkOrSfsBPeRfeVS+/nKstvpYVMbY/4PvXb1D5PM3ANDApIbvsx36Tb4gZol /3m638RVvJ3+VKwMHv4zGt5yISC8XVAJruFtsFKksy1EJVHIZTD+L1AluPUz7zeB33xFzm 6CuJft81lmEC1OKYLFuuJgHVQ14rH2A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=KA2hy76e; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C42631FF; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0280EC4339B; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:35:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1684917353; bh=kbD8GySk4t92OZQxFzt3j7NVUVYR3jwkepDeRGqlkns=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KA2hy76eYBOkYRdNyfrfTOndEMZe3ddoylPYtsr0tbNn/AiA6HDYy6/lOq1oSP+AX mqR57czakHxfgUm21fcNL/P4aGsa1F2JpIfT7N/9P0m4odL0eiUVP94C1TrDyEvZHv x5/Qb1lhahgoE9fecW2zfNB8RZLNFstxJ9ec4Kh9U+7E8TR7D4IEfskosS6UqHfDDN 8BX3YYpmSugoKTioX/2aKnZKZFG0gk7wyatiusCFaCUrcueI/Vjpv2AGAtgfmnIns7 33SUtxZtnbPAz6ck8OWg7wW7e4pU1uBpqc8iADWg+A+lAg7hrJzA8FwqX1FyQ6h9/e 39X8WHC0UwoIg== Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:35:34 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Yuwei Guan , akpm@linux-foundation.org, tsahu@linux.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] memblock: Add flags and nid info in memblock debugfs Message-ID: <20230524083534.GK4967@kernel.org> References: <20230519105321.333-1-ssawgyw@gmail.com> <20230523160539.GH4967@kernel.org> <323ae5c0-8cb1-6ca8-a16f-541c1765a2e3@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <323ae5c0-8cb1-6ca8-a16f-541c1765a2e3@arm.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 890F1100002 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Stat-Signature: n3dyxzzt5atuzk8d6jbawccqbmytrspk X-HE-Tag: 1684917355-398772 X-HE-Meta: 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 hTN1R+/s qVbZ+ksnADnZ2faXuky4EZLBbKAU3jVMCMyD0lihGnUU3PDZ0pPIjg6MEhWJsleV1YdoTUke1u1gY5Z/4yiW88gYvyNiL9qhFfLRJkCr1A415XdbL8OgfeYmdV0CooxIi7Xz1RCdjgk/UPtC2XwVU8FoWH8QlGuHZtk92JjgQRt/WT+LwRITZE3PMOX8O/cGruIWh3hlIsnKd99XsSl+rFx1exlvaBhnikqBom5Eh8iqvYt3F4nqCgH+i3l5n6+nD0NZ7HGE97Ogch2dGuX1BxSykVucsjUJoTjD7/+FzYsVCwiwjdors/YE0Rg== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:42:40AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 5/23/23 21:35, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:53:21PM +0800, Yuwei Guan wrote: > >> Currently, the memblock debugfs can display the count of memblock_type and > >> the base and end of the reg. However, when memblock_mark_*() or > >> memblock_set_node() is executed on some range, the information in the > >> existing debugfs cannot make it clear why the address is not consecutive. > >> > >> For example, > >> cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory > >> 0: 0x0000000080000000..0x00000000901fffff > >> 1: 0x0000000090200000..0x00000000905fffff > >> 2: 0x0000000090600000..0x0000000092ffffff > >> 3: 0x0000000093000000..0x00000000973fffff > >> 4: 0x0000000097400000..0x00000000b71fffff > >> 5: 0x00000000c0000000..0x00000000dfffffff > >> 6: 0x00000000e2500000..0x00000000f87fffff > >> 7: 0x00000000f8800000..0x00000000fa7fffff > >> 8: 0x00000000fa800000..0x00000000fd3effff > >> 9: 0x00000000fd3f0000..0x00000000fd3fefff > >> 10: 0x00000000fd3ff000..0x00000000fd7fffff > >> 11: 0x00000000fd800000..0x00000000fd901fff > >> 12: 0x00000000fd902000..0x00000000fd909fff > >> 13: 0x00000000fd90a000..0x00000000fd90bfff > >> 14: 0x00000000fd90c000..0x00000000ffffffff > >> 15: 0x0000000880000000..0x0000000affffffff > >> > >> So we can add flags and nid to this debugfs. > >> > >> For example, > >> cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory > >> 0: 0x0000000080000000..0x00000000901fffff 0 NONE > >> 1: 0x0000000090200000..0x00000000905fffff 0 NOMAP > >> 2: 0x0000000090600000..0x0000000092ffffff 0 NONE > >> 3: 0x0000000093000000..0x00000000973fffff 0 NOMAP > >> 4: 0x0000000097400000..0x00000000b71fffff 0 NONE > >> 5: 0x00000000c0000000..0x00000000dfffffff 0 NONE > >> 6: 0x00000000e2500000..0x00000000f87fffff 0 NONE > >> 7: 0x00000000f8800000..0x00000000fa7fffff 0 NOMAP > >> 8: 0x00000000fa800000..0x00000000fd3effff 0 NONE > >> 9: 0x00000000fd3f0000..0x00000000fd3fefff 0 NOMAP > >> 10: 0x00000000fd3ff000..0x00000000fd7fffff 0 NONE > >> 11: 0x00000000fd800000..0x00000000fd901fff 0 NOMAP > >> 12: 0x00000000fd902000..0x00000000fd909fff 0 NONE > >> 13: 0x00000000fd90a000..0x00000000fd90bfff 0 NOMAP > >> 14: 0x00000000fd90c000..0x00000000ffffffff 0 NONE > >> 15: 0x0000000880000000..0x0000000affffffff 0 NONE > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan > >> --- > >> v4: > >> - show string value for each memblock flag > >> --- > >> mm/memblock.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > >> index 511d4783dcf1..10d0ddbeebc1 100644 > >> --- a/mm/memblock.c > >> +++ b/mm/memblock.c > >> @@ -2136,12 +2136,19 @@ void __init memblock_free_all(void) > >> } > >> > >> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK) > >> +static const char * const flagname[] = { > >> + [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG)] = "HOTPLUG", > >> + [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_MIRROR)] = "MIRROR", > >> + [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_NOMAP)] = "NOMAP", > >> + [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_DRIVER_MANAGED)] = "DRV_MNG", > >> +}; > >> > >> static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private) > >> { > >> struct memblock_type *type = m->private; > >> struct memblock_region *reg; > >> - int i; > >> + int i, j; > >> + unsigned int count = ARRAY_SIZE(flagname); > >> phys_addr_t end; > >> > >> for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) { > >> @@ -2149,7 +2156,20 @@ static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private) > >> end = reg->base + reg->size - 1; > >> > >> seq_printf(m, "%4d: ", i); > >> - seq_printf(m, "%pa..%pa\n", ®->base, &end); > >> + seq_printf(m, "%pa..%pa ", ®->base, &end); > >> + seq_printf(m, "%4d ", memblock_get_region_node(reg)); > >> + if (reg->flags) { > >> + for (j = 0; j < count; j++) { > >> + if (reg->flags & (1U << j)) { > >> + seq_printf(m, "%s\n", flagname[j]); > >> + break; > > > > The flags are mostly mutually exclusive because it's unlikely they are used > > together, but not because there are some restrictions on possible flags > > combinations. So generally it's possible to have multiple flags set on the > > same region. > > But do we really need to account for that as of now, when no memblock region > carries more than a single flag ? Right now we don't care indeed, I'm a bit concerned of what will happen if we'd have regions with multiple flags set. > But in that case all flags here need to be printed with "|" in between ? We could use space rather than "|" for simplicity, but thinking more about it, I'm inclined to just take this version and we'll deal with multiple flags if/when required. > > Sorry, I missed that in v3. > > > >> + } > >> + } > >> + if (j == count) > >> + seq_printf(m, "%s\n", "UNKNOWN"); > >> + } else { > >> + seq_printf(m, "%s\n", "NONE"); > >> + } > >> } > >> return 0; > >> } > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.