From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sjenning@redhat.com, ddstreet@ieee.org, vitaly.wool@konsulko.com,
yosryahmed@google.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: zswap: shrink until can accept
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 14:10:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230526181023.GA49039@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230526173955.781115-1-cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 07:39:55PM +0200, Domenico Cerasuolo wrote:
> This update addresses an issue with the zswap reclaim mechanism, which
> hinders the efficient offloading of cold pages to disk, thereby
> compromising the preservation of the LRU order and consequently
> diminishing, if not inverting, its performance benefits.
>
> The functioning of the zswap shrink worker was found to be inadequate,
> as shown by basic benchmark test. For the test, a kernel build was
> utilized as a reference, with its memory confined to 1G via a cgroup and
> a 5G swap file provided. The results are presented below, these are
> averages of three runs without the use of zswap:
>
> real 46m26s
> user 35m4s
> sys 7m37s
>
> With zswap (zbud) enabled and max_pool_percent set to 1 (in a 32G
> system), the results changed to:
>
> real 56m4s
> user 35m13s
> sys 8m43s
>
> written_back_pages: 18
> reject_reclaim_fail: 0
> pool_limit_hit:1478
>
> Besides the evident regression, one thing to notice from this data is
> the extremely low number of written_back_pages and pool_limit_hit.
>
> The pool_limit_hit counter, which is increased in zswap_frontswap_store
> when zswap is completely full, doesn't account for a particular
> scenario: once zswap hits his limit, zswap_pool_reached_full is set to
> true; with this flag on, zswap_frontswap_store rejects pages if zswap is
> still above the acceptance threshold. Once we include the rejections due
> to zswap_pool_reached_full && !zswap_can_accept(), the number goes from
> 1478 to a significant 21578266.
>
> Zswap is stuck in an undesirable state where it rejects pages because
> it's above the acceptance threshold, yet fails to attempt memory
> reclaimation. This happens because the shrink work is only queued when
> zswap_frontswap_store detects that it's full and the work itself only
> reclaims one page per run.
>
> This state results in hot pages getting written directly to disk,
> while cold ones remain memory, waiting only to be invalidated. The LRU
> order is completely broken and zswap ends up being just an overhead
> without providing any benefits.
>
> This commit applies 2 changes: a) the shrink worker is set to reclaim
> pages until the acceptance threshold is met and b) the task is also
> enqueued when zswap is not full but still above the threshold.
>
> Testing this suggested update showed much better numbers:
>
> real 36m37s
> user 35m8s
> sys 9m32s
>
> written_back_pages: 10459423
> reject_reclaim_fail: 12896
> pool_limit_hit: 75653
>
> V2:
> - loop against == -EAGAIN rather than != -EINVAL and also break the loop
> on MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES (thanks Yosry)
> - cond_resched() to ensure that the loop doesn't burn the cpu (thanks
> Vitaly)
>
> Fixes: 45190f01dd40 ("mm/zswap.c: add allocation hysteresis if pool limit is hit")
> Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/zswap.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> index 59da2a415fbb..f953dceaab34 100644
> --- a/mm/zswap.c
> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include "swap.h"
> +#include "internal.h"
>
> /*********************************
> * statistics
> @@ -587,9 +588,17 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> {
> struct zswap_pool *pool = container_of(w, typeof(*pool),
> shrink_work);
> + int ret, failures = 0;
>
> - if (zpool_shrink(pool->zpool, 1, NULL))
> - zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
> + do {
> + ret = zpool_shrink(pool->zpool, 1, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
> + failures++;
> + }
> + cond_resched();
> + } while (!zswap_can_accept() && ret == -EAGAIN &&
> + failures < MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES);
It should also loop on !ret, right?
AFAIU Yosry's suggestion was that instead of breaking only on -EINVAL,
it should break on all failures but -EAGAIN. But it should still keep
going if the shrink was successful and the pool cannot accept yet.
Basically, something like this?
do {
ret = zpool_shrink(pool->zpool, 1, NULL);
if (ret) {
zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++;
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
if (++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
break;
}
cond_resched();
} while (!zswap_can_accept());
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-26 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-26 17:39 [PATCH v2] mm: zswap: shrink until can accept Domenico Cerasuolo
2023-05-26 18:10 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2023-05-26 18:15 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-26 18:16 ` Domenico Cerasuolo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230526181023.GA49039@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vitaly.wool@konsulko.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.