From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: new scrub code vs zoned file systems
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:17:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230531141739.GA2160@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a59b2274-9d64-f11e-f726-9283f560a495@wdc.com>
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:04:05PM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>
> Heh and this has never actually worked IMHO.
>
> I did a crude hack to bandaid scrub:
I think the better approach is to:
a) branch out at a very high level to the zoned code in
flush_scrub_stripes, or in fact even higher given that we
don't really care about tracking stripes. The write
side of scrub has to work at a zone, not stripe level for
zoned devices
b) don't create a new relocation thread per zone, but run it from
the scrub context.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 12:52 new scrub code vs zoned file systems Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 13:10 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-31 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 13:25 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-31 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 14:04 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-31 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-06-01 2:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-06-01 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01 5:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-06-01 5:17 ` Naohiro Aota
2023-06-01 5:21 ` Naohiro Aota
2023-06-01 7:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-06-01 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01 8:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-06-01 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01 5:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01 5:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-06-01 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 22:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-05-31 22:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-06-01 4:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01 5:04 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230531141739.GA2160@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.