All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: shr@devkernel.io, axboe@kernel.dk, ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, olivier@trillion01.com
Subject: [PATCH v14 1/8] net: split off __napi_busy_poll from napi_busy_poll
Date: Mon,  5 Jun 2023 14:20:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230605212009.1992313-2-shr@devkernel.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230605212009.1992313-1-shr@devkernel.io>

This splits off the key part of the napi_busy_poll function into its own
function __napi_busy_poll. This is done in preparation for an additional
napi_busy_poll() function, that doesn't take the rcu_read_lock(). The
new function is introduced in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 253584777101..f4677aa20f84 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6166,66 +6166,79 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock, bool
 	local_bh_enable();
 }
 
+struct napi_busy_poll_ctx {
+	struct napi_struct *napi;
+	int (*napi_poll)(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget);
+	void *have_poll_lock;
+};
+
+static inline void __napi_busy_poll(struct napi_busy_poll_ctx *ctx,
+				    bool prefer_busy_poll, u16 budget)
+{
+	struct napi_struct *napi = ctx->napi;
+	int work = 0;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+	local_bh_disable();
+	if (!ctx->napi_poll) {
+		unsigned long val = READ_ONCE(napi->state);
+
+		/* If multiple threads are competing for this napi,
+		 * we avoid dirtying napi->state as much as we can.
+		 */
+		if (val & (NAPIF_STATE_DISABLE | NAPIF_STATE_SCHED |
+			   NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL)) {
+			if (prefer_busy_poll)
+				set_bit(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, &napi->state);
+			goto count;
+		}
+		if (cmpxchg(&napi->state, val,
+			    val | NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL |
+				  NAPIF_STATE_SCHED) != val) {
+			if (prefer_busy_poll)
+				set_bit(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, &napi->state);
+			goto count;
+		}
+		ctx->have_poll_lock = netpoll_poll_lock(napi);
+		ctx->napi_poll = napi->poll;
+	}
+	work = ctx->napi_poll(napi, budget);
+	trace_napi_poll(napi, work, budget);
+	gro_normal_list(napi);
+
+count:
+	if (work > 0)
+		__NET_ADD_STATS(dev_net(napi->dev),
+				LINUX_MIB_BUSYPOLLRXPACKETS, work);
+	local_bh_enable();
+}
 void napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id,
 		    bool (*loop_end)(void *, unsigned long),
 		    void *loop_end_arg, bool prefer_busy_poll, u16 budget)
 {
 	unsigned long start_time = loop_end ? busy_loop_current_time() : 0;
-	int (*napi_poll)(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget);
-	void *have_poll_lock = NULL;
-	struct napi_struct *napi;
+	struct napi_busy_poll_ctx ctx = {};
 
 restart:
-	napi_poll = NULL;
+	ctx.napi_poll = NULL;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
-	napi = napi_by_id(napi_id);
-	if (!napi)
+	ctx.napi = napi_by_id(napi_id);
+	if (!ctx.napi)
 		goto out;
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	for (;;) {
-		int work = 0;
-
-		local_bh_disable();
-		if (!napi_poll) {
-			unsigned long val = READ_ONCE(napi->state);
-
-			/* If multiple threads are competing for this napi,
-			 * we avoid dirtying napi->state as much as we can.
-			 */
-			if (val & (NAPIF_STATE_DISABLE | NAPIF_STATE_SCHED |
-				   NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL)) {
-				if (prefer_busy_poll)
-					set_bit(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, &napi->state);
-				goto count;
-			}
-			if (cmpxchg(&napi->state, val,
-				    val | NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL |
-					  NAPIF_STATE_SCHED) != val) {
-				if (prefer_busy_poll)
-					set_bit(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, &napi->state);
-				goto count;
-			}
-			have_poll_lock = netpoll_poll_lock(napi);
-			napi_poll = napi->poll;
-		}
-		work = napi_poll(napi, budget);
-		trace_napi_poll(napi, work, budget);
-		gro_normal_list(napi);
-count:
-		if (work > 0)
-			__NET_ADD_STATS(dev_net(napi->dev),
-					LINUX_MIB_BUSYPOLLRXPACKETS, work);
-		local_bh_enable();
+		__napi_busy_poll(&ctx, prefer_busy_poll, budget);
 
 		if (!loop_end || loop_end(loop_end_arg, start_time))
 			break;
 
 		if (unlikely(need_resched())) {
-			if (napi_poll)
-				busy_poll_stop(napi, have_poll_lock, prefer_busy_poll, budget);
+			if (ctx.napi_poll)
+				busy_poll_stop(ctx.napi, ctx.have_poll_lock, prefer_busy_poll, budget);
 			preempt_enable();
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			cond_resched();
@@ -6235,8 +6248,8 @@ void napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id,
 		}
 		cpu_relax();
 	}
-	if (napi_poll)
-		busy_poll_stop(napi, have_poll_lock, prefer_busy_poll, budget);
+	if (ctx.napi_poll)
+		busy_poll_stop(ctx.napi, ctx.have_poll_lock, prefer_busy_poll, budget);
 	preempt_enable();
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.39.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-05 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-05 21:20 [PATCH v14 0/8] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 21:20 ` Stefan Roesch [this message]
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 2/8] net: introduce napi_busy_loop_rcu() Stefan Roesch
2023-06-06 10:10   ` Simon Horman
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 3/8] net: split off _napi_busy_loop() Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 22:21   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 4/8] io-uring: move io_wait_queue definition to header file Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 5/8] io-uring: add napi busy poll support Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 6/8] io-uring: add sqpoll support for napi busy poll Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 7/8] io_uring: add register/unregister napi function Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 21:20 ` [PATCH v14 8/8] io_uring: add prefer busy poll to register and unregister napi api Stefan Roesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230605212009.1992313-2-shr@devkernel.io \
    --to=shr@devkernel.io \
    --cc=ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olivier@trillion01.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.