From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4879C7EE45 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:05:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1686215100; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=mfC75rKlS0iG9WO4OWdYMjBaMwiLP4reSJF5qLNrANs=; b=bKItdrRQm8JbJ8g90vepH7bAcP++45cuII2pjU3ihk5JZmWl+KsYeJxnhdnwTMuydABoPF tTNqYn+UVKLqAVHQIuvrA9uP/NvvJ0a9julvLMJ4ZntMJcB7yzX9/Ah2SSxh0slY7wOndi P9HMjAaACBXC/D3+mHP9PCl52wet1hI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-388-gYsU73N5NEGY82r3gxH2BA-1; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 05:04:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gYsU73N5NEGY82r3gxH2BA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CC0185A78E; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AC5140E956; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AD419452CC; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23374194658C for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id DD4D22166B26; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast10.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48752166B25 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF881C04186 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-562-nevv7DvjM16_X_7COzw_Mw-1; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 05:04:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nevv7DvjM16_X_7COzw_Mw-1 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A178768AA6; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Phillip Potter Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chris Mason , dm-devel@redhat.com, "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Pavel Machek , Miquel Raynal , Jack Wang , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Josef Bacik , Coly Li , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , David Sterba , Jens Axboe , Christian Brauner , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "dm-devel" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: lst.de Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3F7C7EE2E for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234276AbjFHJEv (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 05:04:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53600 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231359AbjFHJEu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 05:04:50 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565DB1721; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 02:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A178768AA6; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Phillip Potter Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Richard Weinberger , Josef Bacik , "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Jack Wang , Coly Li , Miquel Raynal , Vignesh Raghavendra , "Martin K. Petersen" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64DAC7EE25 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1q7BZj-0005MU-5u; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:59 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1q7BZh-0005MO-6K for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bQ4hxpwi6OE6UTVICd0IkPx6VL5XPse1f31cPM2BFIE=; b=BAmSxJF2QqaEF0txZ5SkKXGdyp ydAcKe7IfMcm0zwlui6vvslrzOVoSdkoMY6g5a2xEmXyhcq+no+o7S/wMdHv+f7g2qc0YUUWEIZV8 GtlGsHucKwUSVZxnoJJtRt/7sVFvXvSXy2Jf4haW6npzAPjtH8/JdIt6x1lZe6rmtxMg=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bQ4hxpwi6OE6UTVICd0IkPx6VL5XPse1f31cPM2BFIE=; b=aRdFQU8X/HTBwglmntVske90Ma i3+b8dDHW1LZfs7UySNsP6X1D+TQ74ks+iophRST4vysc5KLHWfIPfaijpGa9HAkWOz0gpWkM8W+2 5w+DwESFNDWtVexOSGEJV7nwKawxrlmRABKfByfGMHo8+3MDCL0g7rLX5z7T0k6RHpFc=; Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1q7BZh-0004Mt-0Y for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:57 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A178768AA6; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Phillip Potter Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Headers-End: 1q7BZh-0004Mt-0Y Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chris Mason , dm-devel@redhat.com, "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Pavel Machek , Miquel Raynal , Jack Wang , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Josef Bacik , Coly Li , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , David Sterba , Jens Axboe , Christian Brauner , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WryMWEQVtX1CjnFl0zm0G5QnT+hONfH+tRXT4YewD1M=; b=Ravvi6hv868g16 OXg6CJaR0AVb0+9YTCbPx1fviKONPKYhfDvpR7VKbscuKRL/yToDaoPHAyW0mTden3R6wWZX1yCFC rliHoWLMRMGS8my03So9nT1VgfH1LTTZ7nLsYWokQgNc3HyJSKu4AMO909NHjZ6N8EEVE6sacHgAf xNoObMLP6SZvkDK3mVWOLG2BTTzdmGdUHo+p0CghydSUHtb8IOGiDqS+z8EUU3LyvGPAvcbwkFDIO 2UOtZrMCvyjTVz8oprudVJI16Y+8m3/Cj6yAxT4HOCbJUPTl39d4sgv6GLfWRjf6BGKynHxVgnylP h4hTV6/ZaFwMt2s97iCA==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+glud-user-mode-linux-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: Phillip Potter Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Richard Weinberger , Josef Bacik , "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Jack Wang , Coly Li , Miquel Raynal , Vignesh Raghavendra , "Martin K. Petersen" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93461C7EE29 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZU0zUeSMOC4XZzca+PihAXXoFpmnhoOz3ZVZxBEyVuk=; b=BYllyz4VmDU6L2 BJiAyNiUn8gzfPktKNmUoFSTQFzHmQ6bezo6p5ZY1D5JIgOQFB1IUvARD5cOfrn0CH9xf22ZgF0tx yZjlSqeZ/yjh38CAZoUDK3er2I+D6/EcP9NLjfc1qp/Q1roHqYmSLZiVhVXOSpqtQJeHSC3P6kHYP ee1PEvqLZOleVn8T6XJcMe312Tf59NN4+Ykbqj7M+RDImKWZHi6lyEYYbZMgkw0B0/+QNkNHnm2xk 0VPLjIflCXnv3NmzkyaZ4xHK7ceo9dLOz4kQ6nq+kL9DAQi5oiDWaclJBXzi1Xtf83di3Au1x4xsQ CkW6wKfOeBIPmdtIw2oA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7BZd-008dgI-2J; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:53 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7BZa-008dfU-0T; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:51 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A178768AA6; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Phillip Potter Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Richard Weinberger , Josef Bacik , "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Jack Wang , Coly Li , Miquel Raynal , Vignesh Raghavendra , "Martin K. Petersen" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230608_020450_326678_AADD0A8F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46495C7EE25 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:04:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WryMWEQVtX1CjnFl0zm0G5QnT+hONfH+tRXT4YewD1M=; b=Ravvi6hv868g16 OXg6CJaR0AVb0+9YTCbPx1fviKONPKYhfDvpR7VKbscuKRL/yToDaoPHAyW0mTden3R6wWZX1yCFC rliHoWLMRMGS8my03So9nT1VgfH1LTTZ7nLsYWokQgNc3HyJSKu4AMO909NHjZ6N8EEVE6sacHgAf xNoObMLP6SZvkDK3mVWOLG2BTTzdmGdUHo+p0CghydSUHtb8IOGiDqS+z8EUU3LyvGPAvcbwkFDIO 2UOtZrMCvyjTVz8oprudVJI16Y+8m3/Cj6yAxT4HOCbJUPTl39d4sgv6GLfWRjf6BGKynHxVgnylP h4hTV6/ZaFwMt2s97iCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7BZe-008dge-2u; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:54 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q7BZa-008dfU-0T; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:51 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A178768AA6; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Phillip Potter Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Richard Weinberger , Josef Bacik , "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Jack Wang , Coly Li , Miquel Raynal , Vignesh Raghavendra , "Martin K. Petersen" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230608_020450_326678_AADD0A8F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um