From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97911FD8 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 06:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C601568AFE; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:47:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Juergen Gross Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marczykowski-G=F3recki?= , Stefano Stabellini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ben Skeggs , Karol Herbst , Lyude Paul , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: always initialize xen-swiotlb when xen-pcifront is enabling Message-ID: <20230612064738.GA19518@lst.de> References: <20230518134253.909623-1-hch@lst.de> <20230518134253.909623-3-hch@lst.de> <20230519040405.GA10818@lst.de> <20230607131257.GB19206@lst.de> <79b26dac-b507-1c05-b499-784ca6ee3db0@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79b26dac-b507-1c05-b499-784ca6ee3db0@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:38:28PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> guest started with e820_host=1 even if no PCI passthrough was planned. >>> But this should be rather rare (at least I hope so). >> >> So is this an ACK for the patch and can we go ahead with it? > > As long as above mentioned check of the E820 map is done, yes. > > If you want I can send a diff to be folded into your patch on Monday. Yes, that would be great! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B593C7EE25 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 06:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D0010E164; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 06:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD57F10E164 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 06:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C601568AFE; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:47:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Juergen Gross Message-ID: <20230612064738.GA19518@lst.de> References: <20230518134253.909623-1-hch@lst.de> <20230518134253.909623-3-hch@lst.de> <20230519040405.GA10818@lst.de> <20230607131257.GB19206@lst.de> <79b26dac-b507-1c05-b499-784ca6ee3db0@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79b26dac-b507-1c05-b499-784ca6ee3db0@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 2/4] x86: always initialize xen-swiotlb when xen-pcifront is enabling X-BeenThere: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Nouveau development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Hansen , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marczykowski-G=F3recki?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Ben Skeggs , "H. Peter Anvin" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: nouveau-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Nouveau" On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:38:28PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> guest started with e820_host=1 even if no PCI passthrough was planned. >>> But this should be rather rare (at least I hope so). >> >> So is this an ACK for the patch and can we go ahead with it? > > As long as above mentioned check of the E820 map is done, yes. > > If you want I can send a diff to be folded into your patch on Monday. Yes, that would be great!