All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fs: use backing_file container for internal files with "fake" f_path
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:24:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230615042424.GA4508@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230614074907.1943007-2-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:49:06AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> +static struct file *__alloc_file(int flags, const struct cred *cred)
> +{
> +	struct file *f;
> +	int error;
> +
> +	f = kmem_cache_zalloc(filp_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (unlikely(!f))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	error = init_file(f, flags, cred);
> +	if (unlikely(error))
> +		return ERR_PTR(error);
> +
>  	return f;

Nit: is there much of a point in keeping this now very trivial helper
instead of open coding it in the two callers?

> +/*
> + * Variant of alloc_empty_file() that allocates a backing_file container
> + * and doesn't check and modify nr_files.
> + *
> + * Should not be used unless there's a very good reason to do so.

I'm not sure this comment is all that helpful..  I'd rather explain
when it should be used (i.e. only from open_backing_file) then when
it should not..

> -struct file *open_with_fake_path(const struct path *path, int flags,
> -				struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred)
> +struct file *open_backing_file(const struct path *path, int flags,
> +			       const struct path *real_path,
> +			       const struct cred *cred)

Please write a big fat comment on where this function should and should
not be used and how it works.

> +struct path *backing_file_real_path(struct file *f);
> +static inline const struct path *f_real_path(struct file *f)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(f->f_mode & FMODE_BACKING))
> +		return backing_file_real_path(f);
> +	else
> +		return &f->f_path;
> +}

Nit: no need for the else here.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-15  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-14  7:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] Handle notifications on overlayfs fake path files Amir Goldstein
2023-06-14  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] fs: use backing_file container for internal files with "fake" f_path Amir Goldstein
2023-06-14 13:26   ` Christian Brauner
2023-06-14 13:48     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-06-15 11:32     ` Amir Goldstein
2023-06-15  4:24   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-06-14  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ovl: enable fsnotify events on underlying real files Amir Goldstein
2023-06-14  9:54   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230615042424.GA4508@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.