All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, dianders@chromium.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [alternative-merged] watchdog-hardlockup-rename-have_hardlockup_detector_non_arch-to-_perf_or_buddy.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:20:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230616172000.BC50DC433C8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: watchdog/hardlockup: rename HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH to ..._PERF_OR_BUDDY
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     watchdog-hardlockup-rename-have_hardlockup_detector_non_arch-to-_perf_or_buddy.patch

This patch was dropped because an alternative patch was or shall be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: watchdog/hardlockup: rename HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH to ..._PERF_OR_BUDDY
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:41:40 -0700

HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH is a mouthful and confusing. 
HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY is even more of a mouthful, but
probably less confusing.  Rename the Kconfig names.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230526184139.10.I821fe7609e57608913fe05abd8f35b343e7a9aae@changeid
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 lib/Kconfig.debug |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug~watchdog-hardlockup-rename-have_hardlockup_detector_non_arch-to-_perf_or_buddy
+++ a/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ config HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_BUDDY
 # needs SMP). In either case, using the "non-arch" code conflicts with
 # the NMI watchdog code (which is sometimes used directly and sometimes used
 # by the arch-provided hardlockup detector).
-config HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH
+config HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY
 	bool
 	depends on (HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF || SMP) && !HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG
 	default y
@@ -1077,10 +1077,10 @@ config HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PREFER_BUDDY
 	  an arch-specific hardlockup detector or if resources needed
 	  for the hardlockup detector are better used for other things.
 
-# This will select the appropriate non-arch hardlockdup detector
-config HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH
+# This will select the appropriate non-arch hardlockup detector
+config HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY
 	bool
-	depends on HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH
+	depends on HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY
 	select HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_BUDDY if !HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF || HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PREFER_BUDDY
 	select HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF if HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF && !HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PREFER_BUDDY
 
@@ -1098,9 +1098,9 @@ config HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP
 config HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
 	bool "Detect Hard Lockups"
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && !S390
-	depends on HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH || HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH
+	depends on HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY || HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH
 	select LOCKUP_DETECTOR
-	select HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH if HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_NON_ARCH
+	select HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY if HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF_OR_BUDDY
 
 	help
 	  Say Y here to enable the kernel to act as a watchdog to detect
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from dianders@chromium.org are

watchdog-hardlockup-keep-kernelnmi_watchdog-sysctl-as-0444-if-probe-fails.patch
watchdog-hardlockup-have_nmi_watchdog-must-implement-watchdog_hardlockup_probe.patch
watchdog-hardlockup-dont-use-raw_cpu_ptr-in-watchdog_hardlockup_kick.patch
watchdog-hardlockup-in-watchdog_hardlockup_check-use-cpumask_copy.patch
watchdog-hardlockup-remove-softlockup-comment-in-touch_nmi_watchdog.patch
watchdog-buddy-cleanup-how-watchdog_buddy_check_hardlockup-is-called.patch
watchdog-buddy-dont-copy-the-cpumask-in-watchdog_next_cpu.patch
watchdog-buddy-simplify-the-dependency-for-hardlockup_detector_prefer_buddy.patch
watchdog-hardlockup-move-smp-barriers-from-common-code-to-buddy-code.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-06-16 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230616172000.BC50DC433C8@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.