From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D32EB64DA for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:34:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=r6ZUJ/V9jzfC29S+VCmtbJBFyZeBs5l3isEGxeLCbfY=; b=o13iytLR81FBZ4 tSNkMfoHL2jpO+wTQf/ABWh7ECPckgHN0+9329PZ/GT/nykf47M3N+pry5ZucYh+XECQSH5pM4zRI ZvdPMpnJJd9CuSIh6Qzgub8UJ0zo72tXiwDGzz35pzib1KhNymbYv4Iw0Huk/g1jJQI3G7HPY29LM iGo02OXXry6X8QF7oW9bsx1nuHAodumC0Z4GCMFrL2PJnvf5F7c9rfJTQHLBoewSeP7NGJZhiCyy6 jfhPgXvnHhH5ftEuWZEZmp4+uwSJBF0D2MKTNdjpeyDKNC3k+jsApRLm6YPVsdR1cQ9gCm8UofM1G hmqPpbWM/1GTB03j6bDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qCFlF-00HRNa-1u; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:33:49 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qCFlC-00HRLh-25 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:33:48 +0000 Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Qmtqg5lpkz6GD3t; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:30:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:33:39 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:33:38 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Ilkka Koskinen CC: Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Besar Wicaksono , Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Message-ID: <20230622093338.0000420f@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20230622011141.328029-3-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> References: <20230622011141.328029-1-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> <20230622011141.328029-3-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230622_013346_987125_00D692DA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.69 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:11:39 -0700 Ilkka Koskinen wrote: > Generic filters aren't used in all the platforms. Instead, the platforms > may use different means to filter events. Add support for implementation > specific filters. If the specification allows explicitly for non standard ways of controlling filters it would be good to add a specification reference to this. Otherwise one question inline. > > Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono > Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen > --- > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++-- > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > index 0f517152cb4e..fafd734c3218 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ > > static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state; > > +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter); > + > static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev) > { > return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev); > @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu) > CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_type); > CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_filter); > CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_attr_is_visible); > + CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, set_ev_filter); > > return 0; > } > @@ -792,7 +796,7 @@ static inline void arm_cspmu_set_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > writel(hwc->config, cspmu->base0 + offset); > } > > -static inline void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > struct hw_perf_event *hwc, > u32 filter) > { > @@ -826,7 +830,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int pmu_flags) > arm_cspmu_set_cc_filter(cspmu, filter); > } else { > arm_cspmu_set_event(cspmu, hwc); > - arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter); > + cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter); Optional callback so don't you need either provide a default, or check it isn't null? > } > > hwc->state = 0; > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h > index 83df53d1c132..d6d88c246a23 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h > @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops { > u32 (*event_type)(const struct perf_event *event); > /* Decode filter value from configs */ > u32 (*event_filter)(const struct perf_event *event); > + /* Set event filter */ > + void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter); > /* Hide/show unsupported events */ > umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj, > struct attribute *attr, int unused); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5117BEB64D8 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230100AbjFVIds (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 04:33:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51600 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229472AbjFVIdp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 04:33:45 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B17410D for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 01:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Qmtqg5lpkz6GD3t; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:30:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:33:39 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:33:38 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Ilkka Koskinen CC: Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Besar Wicaksono , Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Message-ID: <20230622093338.0000420f@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20230622011141.328029-3-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> References: <20230622011141.328029-1-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> <20230622011141.328029-3-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:11:39 -0700 Ilkka Koskinen wrote: > Generic filters aren't used in all the platforms. Instead, the platforms > may use different means to filter events. Add support for implementation > specific filters. If the specification allows explicitly for non standard ways of controlling filters it would be good to add a specification reference to this. Otherwise one question inline. > > Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono > Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen > --- > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++-- > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > index 0f517152cb4e..fafd734c3218 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ > > static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state; > > +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter); > + > static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev) > { > return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev); > @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu) > CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_type); > CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_filter); > CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_attr_is_visible); > + CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, set_ev_filter); > > return 0; > } > @@ -792,7 +796,7 @@ static inline void arm_cspmu_set_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > writel(hwc->config, cspmu->base0 + offset); > } > > -static inline void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > struct hw_perf_event *hwc, > u32 filter) > { > @@ -826,7 +830,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int pmu_flags) > arm_cspmu_set_cc_filter(cspmu, filter); > } else { > arm_cspmu_set_event(cspmu, hwc); > - arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter); > + cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter); Optional callback so don't you need either provide a default, or check it isn't null? > } > > hwc->state = 0; > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h > index 83df53d1c132..d6d88c246a23 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h > @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops { > u32 (*event_type)(const struct perf_event *event); > /* Decode filter value from configs */ > u32 (*event_filter)(const struct perf_event *event); > + /* Set event filter */ > + void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter); > /* Hide/show unsupported events */ > umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj, > struct attribute *attr, int unused);